From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
To: "Jakub Narębski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:19:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160726111911.cehaitav4enas7dm@john.keeping.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57973BAD.2020607@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:30:05PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 2016-07-25 o 23:59, John Keeping pisze:
>
> > +test_expect_success 'new branch covered by force-with-lease (explicit)' '
> > + setup_srcdst_basic &&
> > + (
> > + cd dst &&
> > + git branch branch master &&
> > + git push --force-with-lease=branch: origin branch
> > + ) &&
> > + git ls-remote dst refs/heads/branch >expect &&
> > + git ls-remote src refs/heads/branch >actual &&
> > + test_cmp expect actual
> > +'
>
> Do we need to test the negative, that is that if branch is not
> new it prevents push (e.g. when <branch> is HEAD), or is it
> covered by other tests?
It's covered by a test in patch 3 (at least for the implicit case added
there), but I could pull that forwards. In fact, converting that test
to the explicit syntax will make it simpler since we won't need to set
up a non-fast-forward push.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-26 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-23 15:31 [PATCH] push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-lease John Keeping
2016-07-25 17:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-25 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " John Keeping
2016-07-25 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 " John Keeping
2016-07-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Documentation/git-push: fix placeholder formatting John Keeping
2016-07-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation John Keeping
2016-07-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-lease John Keeping
2016-07-25 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Documentation/git-push: fix placeholder formatting John Keeping
2016-07-25 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation John Keeping
2016-07-25 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-26 8:03 ` John Keeping
2016-07-26 19:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-26 20:42 ` John Keeping
2016-07-26 21:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-26 10:30 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-07-26 11:19 ` John Keeping [this message]
2016-07-25 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-lease John Keeping
2016-07-25 22:11 ` [PATCH] " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160726111911.cehaitav4enas7dm@john.keeping.me.uk \
--to=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).