From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 13:30:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3b4d1d5-2a7e-b83c-d8cc-bdac6a8835e2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BFwimcDhwMeFcTJLy-omXiBNzZApkyCnSSRfwXvKi2OUQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/2/2018 1:27 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 12:01 AM Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:08 AM Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/19/2018 3:31 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>> + char *new_path = NULL;
>>>> + if (dir_in_way(b->path, !o->call_depth, 0)) {
>>>> + new_path = unique_path(o, b->path, ci->branch2);
>>>> + output(o, 1, _("%s is a directory in %s adding "
>>>> + "as %s instead"),
>>>> + b->path, ci->branch1, new_path);
>>> I tried really hard, but failed to get a test to cover the block below.
>>> I was able to
>>> find that the "check handling of differently renamed file with D/F
>>> conflicts" test
>>> in t6022-merge-rename.sh covers the block above. Trying to tweak the
>>> example using
>>> untracked files seems to hit an error message from unpack-trees.c instead.
>>>
>>>> + } else if (would_lose_untracked(b->path)) {
>>>> + new_path = unique_path(o, b->path, ci->branch2);
>>>> + output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose untracked file"
>>>> + " at %s; adding as %s instead"),
>>>> + b->path, new_path);
> So now I'm confused. This block was not listed in your coverage
> report[1]. And, in fact, I think this block IS covered by testcase
> 10c of t6043. However, there is a very similar looking block about 30
> lines up that is uncovered (and which was mentioned in your report):
>
> } else if (would_lose_untracked(a->path)) {
> new_path = unique_path(o, a->path, ci->branch1);
> output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose untracked file"
> " at %s; adding as %s instead"),
> a->path, new_path);
>
> covering it, I think, is just a matter of repeating the 10c test with
> the merge repeated in the other direction (checkout B and merge A
> instead of checking out A and merging B) -- and touching up the checks
> accordingly.
>
> However, now I'm wondering if I'm crazy. Was it really the block you
> had highlighted that you were seeing uncovered?
Trust the report (generated by computer) over me (generated by squinting
at an email, trying to match line numbers).
Thanks,
-Stolee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-02 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-14 2:05 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Improve path collision conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-10-14 2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] Add testcases for consistency in file collision conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-14 2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] t6036, t6042: testcases for rename collision of already conflicting files Elijah Newren
2018-10-14 2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] merge-recursive: new function for better colliding conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-10-14 2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] merge-recursive: fix rename/add conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-14 2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] merge-recursive: improve handling for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-10-14 2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] merge-recursive: use handle_file_collision for add/add conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-10-14 2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Improve path collision conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] Add testcases for consistency in file collision conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] t6036, t6042: testcases for rename collision of already conflicting files Elijah Newren
2018-10-31 14:01 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-01 6:57 ` Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] merge-recursive: increase marker length with depth of recursion Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] merge-recursive: new function for better colliding conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-10-31 13:53 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-10-31 13:57 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-01 6:56 ` Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] merge-recursive: fix rename/add conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] merge-recursive: improve handling for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] merge-recursive: use handle_file_collision for add/add conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-31 15:08 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-01 7:01 ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 17:27 ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 17:30 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2018-11-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] Improve path collision conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] Add testcases for consistency in file collision conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] t6036, t6042: testcases for rename collision of already conflicting files Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] merge-recursive: increase marker length with depth of recursion Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] merge-recursive: new function for better colliding conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] merge-recursive: fix rename/add conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] merge-recursive: improve handling for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] merge-recursive: use handle_file_collision for add/add conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 20:01 ` [PATCH] merge-recursive: combine error handling Derrick Stolee
2018-11-02 18:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/10] fixup! merge-recursive: fix rename/add conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 19:05 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] fixup! merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 19:09 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] Improve path collision conflict resolutions Derrick Stolee
2018-11-02 20:06 ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 " Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] Add testcases for consistency in file collision conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] t6036, t6042: testcases for rename collision of already conflicting files Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] merge-recursive: increase marker length with depth of recursion Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] merge-recursive: new function for better colliding conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] merge-recursive: fix rename/add conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] merge-recursive: improve handling for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] merge-recursive: use handle_file_collision for add/add conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] t6036, t6043: increase code coverage for file collision handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 4:40 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] merge-recursive: combine error handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 5:25 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3b4d1d5-2a7e-b83c-d8cc-bdac6a8835e2@gmail.com \
--to=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).