git@vger.kernel.org list mirror (unofficial, one of many)
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 00:01:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CABPp-BFZugCFDS_A7FrWdRhp7WO0m8jhsqbSnNCSUWnAVz7mtg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d23b4e26-4df4-273d-a75c-a0af915a6e5e@gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:08 AM Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/19/2018 3:31 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > +                     char *new_path = NULL;
> > +                     if (dir_in_way(b->path, !o->call_depth, 0)) {
> > +                             new_path = unique_path(o, b->path, ci->branch2);
> > +                             output(o, 1, _("%s is a directory in %s adding "
> > +                                            "as %s instead"),
> > +                                    b->path, ci->branch1, new_path);
>
> I tried really hard, but failed to get a test to cover the block below.
> I was able to
> find that the "check handling of differently renamed file with D/F
> conflicts" test
> in t6022-merge-rename.sh covers the block above. Trying to tweak the
> example using
> untracked files seems to hit an error message from unpack-trees.c instead.
>
> > +                     } else if (would_lose_untracked(b->path)) {
> > +                             new_path = unique_path(o, b->path, ci->branch2);
> > +                             output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose untracked file"
> > +                                            " at %s; adding as %s instead"),
> > +                                    b->path, new_path);
>
> It could also be that I failed because I'm less familiar with this part
> of the
> codebase. Elijah, do you think it is possible to hit this block?

Yeah, this one's going to be a little harder; the upper block would be
done with a D/F, but I think for this block you'd need a directory
rename so that unpack-trees.c can't tell that the untracked file in
the way is actually in the way of anything.  But since this is in the
rename/rename(1to2) area, I think I had rules around avoiding doing
directory renames if the other side renamed the file to avoid getting
into rename/rename(1to3) situations and other weirdness.  So, it might
require a transitive rename (i.e. file renamed on both sides, and on
one side it's renamed into a directory that the other side renamed
away).

I'll try to take a look at it tomorrow, with everything else.  We'll
see how much I can get done.

Thanks for digging in to all these and bringing them up.

  reply index

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-14  2:05 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Improve path collision conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-10-14  2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] Add testcases for consistency in file collision conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-14  2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] t6036, t6042: testcases for rename collision of already conflicting files Elijah Newren
2018-10-14  2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] merge-recursive: new function for better colliding conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-10-14  2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] merge-recursive: fix rename/add conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-14  2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] merge-recursive: improve handling for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-10-14  2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] merge-recursive: use handle_file_collision for add/add conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-10-14  2:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Improve path collision conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31   ` [PATCH v3 1/8] Add testcases for consistency in file collision conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31   ` [PATCH v3 2/8] t6036, t6042: testcases for rename collision of already conflicting files Elijah Newren
2018-10-31 14:01     ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-01  6:57       ` Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31   ` [PATCH v3 3/8] merge-recursive: increase marker length with depth of recursion Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31   ` [PATCH v3 4/8] merge-recursive: new function for better colliding conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-10-31 13:53     ` Derrick Stolee
2018-10-31 13:57       ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-01  6:56         ` Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31   ` [PATCH v3 5/8] merge-recursive: fix rename/add conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31   ` [PATCH v3 6/8] merge-recursive: improve handling for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31   ` [PATCH v3 7/8] merge-recursive: use handle_file_collision for add/add conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-10-19 19:31   ` [PATCH v3 8/8] merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling Elijah Newren
2018-10-31 15:08     ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-01  7:01       ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2018-11-02 17:27         ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 17:30           ` Derrick Stolee
2018-11-02 18:53   ` [PATCH v4 00/10] Improve path collision conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53     ` [PATCH v4 01/10] Add testcases for consistency in file collision conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53     ` [PATCH v4 02/10] t6036, t6042: testcases for rename collision of already conflicting files Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53     ` [PATCH v4 03/10] merge-recursive: increase marker length with depth of recursion Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53     ` [PATCH v4 04/10] merge-recursive: new function for better colliding conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53     ` [PATCH v4 05/10] merge-recursive: fix rename/add conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53     ` [PATCH v4 06/10] merge-recursive: improve handling for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53     ` [PATCH v4 07/10] merge-recursive: use handle_file_collision for add/add conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 18:53     ` [PATCH v4 08/10] merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 20:01       ` [PATCH] merge-recursive: combine error handling Derrick Stolee
2018-11-02 18:53     ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/10] fixup! merge-recursive: fix rename/add conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 19:05     ` [PATCH v4 10/10] fixup! merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-02 19:09     ` [PATCH v4 00/10] Improve path collision conflict resolutions Derrick Stolee
2018-11-02 20:06       ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  4:40         ` [PATCH v5 " Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  4:40           ` [PATCH v5 01/10] Add testcases for consistency in file collision conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  4:40           ` [PATCH v5 02/10] t6036, t6042: testcases for rename collision of already conflicting files Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  4:40           ` [PATCH v5 03/10] merge-recursive: increase marker length with depth of recursion Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  4:40           ` [PATCH v5 04/10] merge-recursive: new function for better colliding conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  4:40           ` [PATCH v5 05/10] merge-recursive: fix rename/add conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  4:40           ` [PATCH v5 06/10] merge-recursive: improve handling for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  4:40           ` [PATCH v5 07/10] merge-recursive: use handle_file_collision for add/add conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  4:40           ` [PATCH v5 08/10] merge-recursive: improve rename/rename(1to2)/add[/add] handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  4:40           ` [PATCH v5 09/10] t6036, t6043: increase code coverage for file collision handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  4:40           ` [PATCH v5 10/10] merge-recursive: combine error handling Elijah Newren
2018-11-08  5:25             ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABPp-BFZugCFDS_A7FrWdRhp7WO0m8jhsqbSnNCSUWnAVz7mtg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=stolee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

git@vger.kernel.org list mirror (unofficial, one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/git
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:
	nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git

 note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox