From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>,
Kevin Willford <kewillf@microsoft.com>,
Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] diff_flush_patch_id: stop returning error result
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:58:25 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609091455180.129229@virtualbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160909104007.pwki2ir6et3vvk55@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi Peff,
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 12:28:38PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > I like the simplification, but I *hate* the fact that the calling code has
> > *no way* to inform the user about the proper next steps.
> >
> > You are touching code that is really quite at the bottom of a lot of call
> > chains. For example in the one of `git pull --rebase`. I just spent an
> > insane amount of time trying to make sure that this command will not
> > simply die() somewhere deep in the code, leaving the user puzzled.
> >
> > Please see 3be18b4 (t5520: verify that `pull --rebase` shows the helpful
> > advice when failing, 2016-07-26) for more details.
>
> Yes, I agree that this is the opposite direction of libification. And I
> agree that the current message is not very helpful.
>
> But I am not sure that returning the error up the stack will actually
> help somebody move forward. The reason these are all die() calls in the
> rest of the diff code is that they are generally indicative of
> unrecoverable repository corruption. So any advice does not really
> depend on what operation you are performing; it is always "stop what you
> are doing immediately, run fsck, and try to get the broken objects from
> somebody else".
>
> So IMHO, on balance this is not hurting anything.
Well, you make such a situation even worse than it already is.
It would be one thing to change the code to actually say "stop what you
are doing immediately, run `git fsck` and try to get the broken objects
from somewhere else", *before* saying how to proceed after that.
But that is not what your patch does.
What your patch does is to remove *even the possibility* of saying how to
proceed after getting the repository corruption fixed. And instead of
saying how the corruption could be fixed, it outputs a terse "cannot read
files to diff".
I do not think that is a wise direction.
Ciao,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-09 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-07 7:53 [RFC/PATCH 0/2] more patch-id speedups Jeff King
2016-09-07 7:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] patch-ids: turn off rename detection Jeff King
2016-09-07 12:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-09-07 7:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] patch-ids: skip merge commits Jeff King
2016-09-07 12:52 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-09-07 18:46 ` Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:08 ` Jeff King
2016-09-07 13:06 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/2] more patch-id speedups Johannes Schindelin
2016-09-07 18:49 ` Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:01 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 0/3] patch-id for merges Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] patch-ids: turn off rename detection Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:12 ` Jacob Keller
2016-09-07 22:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] diff_flush_patch_id: stop returning error result Jeff King
2016-09-08 0:51 ` Ramsay Jones
2016-09-08 7:20 ` Jeff King
2016-09-09 10:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-09-09 10:40 ` Jeff King
2016-09-09 12:58 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2016-09-09 19:37 ` Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] patch-ids: use commit sha1 as patch-id for merge commits Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:28 ` Jacob Keller
2016-09-07 22:38 ` Jeff King
2016-09-07 22:51 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 0/3] patch-id for merges Josh Triplett
2016-09-08 7:30 ` Jeff King
2016-09-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Jeff King
2016-09-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] patch-ids: turn off rename detection Jeff King
2016-09-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] patch-ids: define patch-id of merge commits as "null" Jeff King
2016-09-09 20:37 ` Jeff King
2016-09-09 21:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] patch-id for merges Junio C Hamano
2016-09-12 15:59 ` Jeff King
2016-09-12 17:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-12 17:56 ` Jeff King
2016-09-12 20:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-25 18:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1609091455180.129229@virtualbox \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kewillf@microsoft.com \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).