From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Kevin Willford <Kevin.Willford@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] p3400: stop using tac(1)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 15:38:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVyppmEGkNCxZ+5L@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6a1296f-f524-9042-7f88-9591522971af@web.de>
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 08:45:38PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> Am 04.10.21 um 10:31 schrieb Jeff King:
> > On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 07:44:14PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> >
> >> b3dfeebb92 (rebase: avoid computing unnecessary patch IDs, 2016-07-29)
> >> added a perf test that calls tac(1) from GNU core utilities. Support
> >> systems without it by reversing the generated list using sort -nr
> >> instead. sort(1) with options -n and -r is already used in other tests.
> >
> > Cute fix. With regular seq(1), this whole thing can become:
> >
> > seq 1000 -1 1
> >
> > without the extra process, but our test_seq doesn't understand non-1
> > increments (nor comparisons besides -le). It wouldn't be that hard to
> > teach it, but given that this is the first time we've wanted it, it may
> > not be worth the effort.
>
> Right. The original also allows "seq 1000 1", by the way. Not sure we
> need that either.
I'm not sure what you mean by "original" here. "seq 1000 1" produces no
output for me (nor does it work with test_seq).
> But when you say "without the extra process", I think:
I meant without the extra tac/sort process.
> test_seq () {
> set_step='END {step = first < last ? 1 : -1}'
> loop='END {for (; first <= last && step > 0 || first >= last && step < 0; first += step) print first}'
> case $# in
> 1) awk -v first=1 -v last="$1" "$set_step $loop" ;;
> 2) awk -v first="$1" -v last="$2" "$set_step $loop" ;;
> 3) awk -v first="$1" -v last="$3" -v step="$2" "$loop" ;;
> *) BUG "not 1, 2, or 3 parameters to test_seq" ;;
> esac </dev/null
> }
Right, that works. It does introduce an extra awk process per
invocation, though I doubt that really matters all that much. The diff I
showed in my earlier response works totally in shell, like the current
test_seq().
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-05 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-02 17:44 [PATCH] p3400: stop using tac(1) René Scharfe
2021-10-04 8:31 ` Jeff King
2021-10-05 18:45 ` René Scharfe
2021-10-05 19:38 ` Jeff King [this message]
2021-10-05 19:54 ` René Scharfe
2021-10-07 20:42 ` René Scharfe
2021-10-07 23:44 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YVyppmEGkNCxZ+5L@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Kevin.Willford@microsoft.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).