git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>
To: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>,
	Jan Holesovsky <kendy@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: Git benchmarks at OpenOffice.org wiki
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:28:55 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705021523290.24218@reaper.quantumfyre.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705021158.04481.andyparkins@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andy Parkins wrote:

> On Wednesday 2007 May 02, Julian Phillips wrote:
>
>> A fully packed clone of the OOo git repo was indeed 1.3G, and the entrire
>> checkout + repo was indeed 8.5G (using git 1.5.1.2).


oops, meant 2.7G not 8.5G there ... sorry, was working from memory.

jp3@electron: ooo(unxsplash)>du -sh .git
1.3G    .git
jp3@electron: ooo(unxsplash)>du -sh .
2.7G    .
jp3@electron: ooo(unxsplash)>ls .git/objects/
info  pack


> I'm more confused now then.  I assumed the figures were accurate, but they
> cannot be:
>
>                               CVS      git      SVN
> Size of data on the server     8.5G     1.3G     n/a
> Size of checkout               1.4G     2.8G     1.5G
>
> I don't doubt the 1.3G on the server - and assume that is fully packed.  The
> checkout sizes are suspicious though.  Is that 2.8G packed?
> - If it is, then we can deduce that this is a repo+source size, since the
>   server is packed size+0 therefore the size of the source tree is
>    2.8G - 1.3G = 1.5G

the difference between 2.7G and 2.8G may be due to filesystem difference?

>   In which case the other figures are wrong:
>    - CVS checkout is 1.4G - impossible, the source tree is 1.5G. And where is
>      the overhead of the CVS directories which would make it more than 1.5G?
>    - SVN checkout overhead is always _at least_ the size of the source tree
>      because it keeps a pristine copy of HEAD.  If the source tree is 1.5G,
>      then this figure should be at least 3G.

I was wondering about the subversion figures too ...

> - If it is not, then we're back to "I don't believe that git was packed"
>
> Something smells fishy here - either the source tree size is included in some,
> but not in others or the git repository wasn't packed.

1.3G is the packed size ...

jp3@electron: ooo(unxsplash)>ls -sh .git/objects/pack/
total 1.3G
  37M pack-87efcac9bcb117328e8a1b0c1b42c88c3603c5b7.idx
1.2G pack-87efcac9bcb117328e8a1b0c1b42c88c3603c5b7.pack

-- 
Julian

  ---
To err is humor.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-02 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-01 21:46 Git benchmarks at OpenOffice.org wiki Jakub Narebski
2007-05-01 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-02  8:55 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02  9:51   ` Julian Phillips
2007-05-02 10:58     ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 14:28       ` Julian Phillips [this message]
2007-05-02 15:30         ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 17:11           ` Julian Phillips
2007-05-02 14:37       ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 15:33         ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 17:26       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-02 10:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 11:33   ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-02 14:55     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-05  3:56     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-07  8:05       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-07 15:22         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-02 14:41   ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 16:24     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 14:24 ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 14:35   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 16:15   ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 16:27     ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 16:37       ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 16:48         ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 23:30   ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-03 11:51     ` [tools-dev] " Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-03 12:54       ` Alex Riesen
2007-05-03 15:14       ` Johannes Sixt
2007-05-04  0:48       ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-03  7:03 ` Florian Weimer
2007-05-03  9:33   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-03 10:16     ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-03 10:48       ` Martin Langhoff
2007-05-06 20:05         ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-03 23:36       ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705021523290.24218@reaper.quantumfyre.co.uk \
    --to=julian@quantumfyre.co.uk \
    --cc=andyparkins@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=kendy@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).