Re: Git benchmarks at OpenOffice.org wiki

[Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>]

  Hi,

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 06:27:51PM CEST, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 May 2007 18:15, Petr Baudis wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:24:24PM CEST, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> > > > What might help here is splitting repository into current (e.g. from
> > > > OOo 2.0) and historical part,
> > >
> > > No, I don't want this ;-)
> >
> > Are you sure? Using the graft mechanism, Git can make this very easy and
> > almost transparent for the user - when he clones he gets no history but
> > he can use say some simple vendor-provided script to download the
> > historical packfile and graft it to the 'current' tree. After that, the
> > graft acts completely transparently and it 'seems' like the history
> > goes on continuously from OOo prehistory up to the latest commit.
> 
> Interesting, I did not know that it is possible to do it so that it appears 
> transparently; this would be indeed a tremendous win - we could start nearly 
> from scratch ;-)
> 
> Please - where could I find more info?  Like what does the script have to do, 
> etc.

  you can see an example script at

	http://repo.or.cz/w/elinks.git?a=blob;f=contrib/grafthistory.sh

and I have tried vainly few times to get a similar script to the kernel
too

	http://lists.zerezo.com/linux-kernel/msg6599002.html

that can use both wget and curl and will also download tag refs for the
history.

  The format of the grafts file itself (.git/info/grafts) is pretty
simple (just one-graft-per-line where you first say the commit id and
then the parent commit(s) to be drafted onto it), please see
Documentation/repository-layout.txt for details.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Ever try. Ever fail. No matter. // Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
		-- Samuel Beckett