From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>,
Bo Yang <struggleyb.nku@gmail.com>,
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] t8001/t8002: blame: demonstrate -L bounds checking bug
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:45:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cRYASsHyujx3uhHtRqSnfC8e1cAEMAa2thS3mgOyF2Ozw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cTDrhruSHouGrKwFy3TqUe1_4YxJi-oWTUUe6KpZ7p4Qw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
>>
>>> A bounds checking bug allows the X in -LX to extend one line past the
>>> end of file. For example, given a file with 5 lines, -L6 is accepted as
>>> valid. Demonstrate this problem.
>>>
>>> While here, also add tests to check that the remaining cases of X and Y
>>> in -LX,Y are handled correctly at and in the vicinity of end-of-file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
>>> ---
>>> t/annotate-tests.sh | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/t/annotate-tests.sh b/t/annotate-tests.sh
>>> index 3524eaf..02fbbf1 100644
>>> --- a/t/annotate-tests.sh
>>> +++ b/t/annotate-tests.sh
>>> @@ -225,10 +225,32 @@ test_expect_success 'blame -L /RE/,-N' '
>>> check_count -L/99/,-3 B 1 B2 1 D 1
>>> '
>>>
>>> +# 'file' ends with an incomplete line, so 'wc' reports one fewer lines than
>>> +# git-blame sees, hence the last line is actually $(wc...)+1.
>>> +test_expect_success 'blame -L X (X == nlines)' '
>>> + n=$(expr $(wc -l <file) + 1) &&
>>> + check_count -L$n C 1
>>
>> This is somewhat curious.
>>
>> Does the problem triggers only on a file that ends with an
>> incomplete line, or the test was inserted at this location only
>> because it was convenient and the problem exists with or without the
>> incomplete final line?
>>
>> I am guessing that it is the latter.
>
> The problem exists with and without the incomplete line. The comment
> mentioning "incomplete line" and "wc" was inserted to explain why it
> was necessary to add one to the result of wc, which might not
> otherwise be obvious.
Would the comment be clearer if phrased like this?
# We want to test -LX where X is the last line of the file, so we need
# to compute the number of lines in the file, which normally would be
# done via 'wc -l'. In this case, however, the last line of 'file' is
# incomplete, so 'wc' reports one fewer than the actual line count. To
# adjust for this anomaly, we must add one to the result of 'wc'.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-05 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-31 8:15 [PATCH 00/11] blame/log -L: additional tests and bug fixes Eric Sunshine
2013-07-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 01/11] t8001/t8002: blame: decompose overly-large test Eric Sunshine
2013-07-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 02/11] t8001/t8002: blame: demonstrate -L bounds checking bug Eric Sunshine
2013-08-05 19:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-05 19:35 ` Eric Sunshine
2013-08-05 19:45 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2013-08-05 23:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 03/11] t8001/t8002: blame: add empty file & partial-line tests Eric Sunshine
2013-07-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 04/11] blame: fix -L bounds checking bug Eric Sunshine
2013-07-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 05/11] t4211: log: demonstrate " Eric Sunshine
2013-07-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 06/11] t4211: retire soon-to-be unimplementable tests Eric Sunshine
2013-07-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 07/11] log: fix -L bounds checking bug Eric Sunshine
2013-07-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 08/11] t8001/t8002: blame: demonstrate acceptance of bogus -LX,+0 and -LX,-0 Eric Sunshine
2013-07-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 09/11] blame: reject empty ranges " Eric Sunshine
2013-07-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 10/11] t8001/t8002: blame: demonstrate acceptance of bogus -L,+0 and -L,-0 Eric Sunshine
2013-07-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 11/11] blame: reject empty ranges " Eric Sunshine
2013-08-03 14:41 ` [PATCH 00/11] blame/log -L: additional tests and bug fixes Thomas Rast
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPig+cRYASsHyujx3uhHtRqSnfC8e1cAEMAa2thS3mgOyF2Ozw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=struggleyb.nku@gmail.com \
--cc=trast@inf.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).