From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>,
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [GSoC update] Sequencer for inclusion
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:11:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALkWK0n41LZ8-ZU2M1oD_ddJ2g2A47MxuO8w+5Ew6Php8gvF+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110711221419.GE30155@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi Jeff, Junio, Jonathan, and Miles,
Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 01:07:20PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> > To be precise, the format used includes
>> >
>> > strategy-option = patience | renormalize
>> >
>> > to represent the effect of "-Xpatience -Xrenormalize". My only worry
>> > about that is that the "|" can sound like "or", which would seem
>> > strange to a user that does not necessarily develop software (so is
>> > not thinking about bitfields). The format used in config files puts
>> >
>> > strategy-option = patience
>> > strategy-option = renormalize
>> >
>> > as separate lines.
>>
>> A very good point again. I do not think anywhere in our codebase we use
>> "|" as a separator for state files (either used for internal or exposed to
>> the end user), and we probably would want to be consistent across
>> commands.
>
> I had the same feeling about the "|". I'm a little confused about what
> these options are good for, though.
Miles Bader writes:
> How about using "+" instead of "|"...?
>
> I think that would make sense both for bitfield-thinking and
> non-bitfield-thinking readers ... :]
Frankly, I don't like the idea of separate lines like "key = value1"
and "key = value 2" -- even a generic *nix configuration file parser
would break here. Yes, I know that we don't use "|" anywhere else; we
don't persist options anywhere else either, so I was trying to be
inventive :p
I didn't realize "|" would confuse users -- if that's the case, should
we use a different separator like Miles' "+" suggestion?
Jeff King writes:
> Is it purely about saving some persistent data between runs, and nobody
> else is going to look at it? In that case, I don't think it matters what
> the format is. Use some unambiguous encoding that we already have
> available (like sq_quote_argv and sq_dequote_argv), and write as little
> code as possible.
>
> Or is it something that, like the information in .git/rebase-apply,
> people might want to read or tweak? In that case, might it make sense to
> follow that lead and split things into one file per item? That keeps the
> parsing burden extremely low for things like shell scripts (or shell
> users) who might want to read or tweak.
Yes, it's a little like the information in .git/rebase-apply. We
should give the user the ability to tweak it by hand: the result from
sq_quote_argv and sq_dequote_argv would look very ugly. Hm, I don't
like the one-file-per-command-line-option approach because: we might
only have a few options now, but when the sequencer is built to
support many actions and options, the directory will be polluted with
lots of files. I was thinking more along the lines of something that
can be parsed using gitconfig.
Thanks.
-- Ram
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-12 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 14:53 [GSoC update] Sequencer for inclusion Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 14:53 ` [PATCH 01/17] advice: Introduce error_resolve_conflict Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 14:53 ` [PATCH 02/17] revert: Inline add_message_to_msg function Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 16:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-13 6:00 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-13 6:42 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-19 16:36 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-19 16:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-19 17:08 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-19 19:36 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-20 5:32 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 14:53 ` [PATCH 03/17] revert: Don't check lone argument in get_encoding Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 16:59 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-13 6:14 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-13 6:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-11 14:53 ` [PATCH 04/17] revert: Rename no_replay to record_origin Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 17:02 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-13 7:35 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-17 19:36 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-11 14:53 ` [PATCH 05/17] revert: Propogate errors upwards from do_pick_commit Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 17:32 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-17 10:46 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-17 16:59 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-19 10:09 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 14:53 ` [PATCH 06/17] revert: Eliminate global "commit" variable Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 17:45 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-13 6:57 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-13 7:10 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-13 8:33 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-13 16:40 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-11 14:53 ` [PATCH 07/17] revert: Introduce struct to keep command-line options Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 18:05 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-13 7:56 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 14:53 ` [PATCH 08/17] revert: Separate cmdline parsing from functional code Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 18:20 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-18 20:53 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-18 21:03 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-11 14:54 ` [PATCH 09/17] revert: Don't create invalid replay_opts in parse_args Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 20:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-12 5:57 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 18:29 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-17 11:56 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-17 18:43 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-11 14:54 ` [PATCH 10/17] sequencer: Announce sequencer state location Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 18:56 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-13 12:10 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-07-17 16:23 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-17 19:19 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-18 19:44 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 14:54 ` [PATCH 11/17] revert: Save data for continuing after conflict resolution Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 21:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-11 21:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-12 5:43 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 19:37 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-17 11:48 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-17 18:40 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-18 19:31 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-19 12:21 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-19 12:34 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 14:54 ` [PATCH 12/17] revert: Save command-line options for continuing operation Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 21:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-12 5:56 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 19:52 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-18 20:18 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 14:54 ` [PATCH 13/17] revert: Introduce a layer of indirection over pick_commits Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 20:03 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-18 21:24 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 14:54 ` [PATCH 14/17] reset: Make hard reset remove the sequencer state Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 20:15 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-17 16:40 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 14:54 ` [PATCH 15/17] revert: Remove sequencer state when no commits are pending Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 19:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-12 6:26 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 14:54 ` [PATCH 16/17] revert: Introduce --reset to remove sequencer state Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 20:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-17 17:10 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-17 19:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-11 14:54 ` [PATCH 17/17] revert: Introduce --continue to continue the operation Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 20:46 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-17 16:11 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-17 18:32 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-18 20:00 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-18 20:09 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-11 17:17 ` [GSoC update] Sequencer for inclusion Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-11 17:57 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 20:05 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 20:11 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-12 7:05 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-11 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-11 22:14 ` Jeff King
2011-07-12 6:41 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra [this message]
2011-07-12 6:47 ` Jeff King
2011-07-13 9:41 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-13 19:07 ` Jeff King
2011-07-18 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH] config: Introduce functions to write non-standard file Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-18 23:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-19 8:52 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-07-12 5:58 ` [GSoC update] Sequencer for inclusion Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-12 6:28 ` Miles Bader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALkWK0n41LZ8-ZU2M1oD_ddJ2g2A47MxuO8w+5Ew6Php8gvF+g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).