git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] connect: know that zero-ID is not a ref
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:03:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJo=hJtg1h1Zvu-TjMtDYVjPB2n0pihA18q3sHBPQ_ZA4dWRKg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160902201321.35egsg5l6r2fvrtw@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
>
> Hmm. So since this is backwards-compatible, I'm not overly concerned
> with changing the client. But I wonder if you considered that the
> documentation is wrong, and that JGit should stop sending the extra
> capabilities line?

No, JGit needs to keep sending the capabilities^{} line in upload-pack
if there were no refs advertised to the client. (If it advertises at
least one ref it does not send this capabilities^{} line.)

> In either case, there will still be breakage until _somebody_ upgrades
> (with your patch, until clients upgrade; with a JGit patch, until the
> server upgrades). So perhaps an interesting question would be: if we
> were writing this now, what is the correct behavior?
>
> For pushing, it is obviously useful to send capabilities even though
> there are no refs (because the client is going to send _you_ something).
> And that is why "capabilities^{}" exists; it is a receive-pack feature
> (that is actually implemented!), and the documentation (which came after
> the implementation) blindly mentioned it for upload-pack, as well.
>
> Is it useful for upload-pack? If we have no refs, there's traditionally
> been nothing to fetch. Perhaps that's something that could change,
> though. For example, there could be a capability to allow fetching
> arbitrary sha1s (we have allowTIPSH1InWant and allowReachableSHA1InWant,
> which obviously both require some refs, but allowArbitrarySHA1 does not
> seem outside the realm of possibility).

Its exactly these sort of extra capabilities. We run JGit in modes
where "out of band" (e.g. URL or higher level protocol framing like an
undocumented HTTP header) allows the fetch-pack client to say "do not
send me advertisements, but I want to learn your capabilities". The
fetch-pack client typically activates the allow-reachable-sha1-in-want
feature and names specific SHA-1s it wants.

This allows the fetch-pack client to bypass a very large advertisement
if it wants only a specific SHA-1 and doesn't care about the ref name
its bound to, or reachable through.


This is also perhaps a stepping stone towards "client speaks first".
If we can later standardize an HTTP query parameter or extra HTTP
header, the server may be able to avoid sending a lot of ref
advertisements, but would still need to advertise capabilities.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-03  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-02 17:15 [PATCH 0/2] handle empty spec-compliant remote repos correctly Jonathan Tan
2016-09-02 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] tests: move test_lazy_prereq JGIT to test-lib.sh Jonathan Tan
2016-09-02 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] connect: know that zero-ID is not a ref Jonathan Tan
2016-09-02 19:37   ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-09-02 19:39   ` Shawn Pearce
2016-09-02 19:56     ` Stefan Beller
2016-09-02 20:00       ` Shawn Pearce
2016-09-02 20:13   ` Jeff King
2016-09-02 22:11     ` Jonathan Tan
2016-09-02 23:19       ` Jeff King
2016-09-03  2:03     ` Shawn Pearce [this message]
2016-09-03  2:17       ` Jeff King
2016-09-02 22:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] handle empty spec-compliant remote repos correctly Jonathan Tan
2016-09-02 22:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tests: move test_lazy_prereq JGIT to test-lib.sh Jonathan Tan
2016-09-07 16:47   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-02 22:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] connect: advertized capability is not a ref Jonathan Tan
2016-09-02 22:40   ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-09-02 23:35   ` Jeff King
2016-09-02 23:48     ` Stefan Beller
2016-09-03  0:37       ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-09-02 23:51     ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-09-03  0:56       ` Jeff King
2016-09-07 17:02   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-07 17:10   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-07 20:38     ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-09-07 23:02       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-07 23:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] handle empty spec-compliant remote repos correctly Jonathan Tan
2016-09-07 23:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] tests: move test_lazy_prereq JGIT to test-lib.sh Jonathan Tan
2016-09-07 23:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] connect: advertized capability is not a ref Jonathan Tan
2016-09-08  1:34   ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-09-08  1:45     ` [PATCH] connect: tighten check for unexpected early hang up (Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] connect: advertized capability is not a ref) Jonathan Nieder
2016-09-08  1:46       ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-09-08  1:50       ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-09-08 16:42         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-08 16:28       ` Stefan Beller
2016-09-08 16:18     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] connect: advertized capability is not a ref Junio C Hamano
2016-09-09 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] handle empty spec-compliant remote repos correctly Jonathan Tan
2016-09-09 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] tests: move test_lazy_prereq JGIT to test-lib.sh Jonathan Tan
2016-09-10  5:51   ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-09-10  6:00     ` Jeff King
2016-09-09 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] connect: tighten check for unexpected early hang up Jonathan Tan
2016-09-09 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] connect: advertized capability is not a ref Jonathan Tan
2016-09-09 19:40   ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-09-09 20:40     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-09 20:09   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-09 20:17 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] handle empty spec-compliant remote repos correctly Jonathan Tan
2016-09-09 21:07   ` Jonathan Nieder
2016-09-09 20:17 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] tests: move test_lazy_prereq JGIT to test-lib.sh Jonathan Tan
2016-09-09 20:17 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] connect: tighten check for unexpected early hang up Jonathan Tan
2016-09-09 20:17 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] connect: advertized capability is not a ref Jonathan Tan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJo=hJtg1h1Zvu-TjMtDYVjPB2n0pihA18q3sHBPQ_ZA4dWRKg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=spearce@spearce.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).