Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] submodule--helper.c: remove duplicate code

[Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 03/09, Valery Tolstov wrote:
>>>>> Remove code fragment from module_clone that duplicates functionality
>>>>> of connect_work_tree_and_git_dir in dir.c
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Valery Tolstov <me@vtolstov.org>
>>>>
>>>> Looks good.
>>>
>>> I'll queue with your Reviewed-by: added.
>>>
>>> If sb/checkout-recurse-submodules is going to be rerolled, I'd
>>> appreciate if it includes this patch inserted at an appropriate
>>> place in the series, instead of me having to remember re-applying
>>> this patch every time it happens.
>>
>> Instead of mixing these two series, can you just take Valerys series as is,
>> and sb/checkout-recurse-submodules builds on top of that when rerolled?
>
> That's fine by me, too, but that still means I need to keep an eye
> on two independent topics that interact each other.  Is a single
> patch 2/2 that important to be on a separate topic?  Expressed in
> another way, is it expected that sb/checkout-recurse-submodules
> would take forever to mature relative to these two patches?

Using the times and number of rerolls this has been around, it
is a not unreasonable to estimate sb/checkout-... will take longer
than this code deduplication patch.

Thanks,
Stefan