From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>,
git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tag: add tag.gpgSign config option to force all tags be GPG-signed
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:45:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kZahLWdYJ2poi1QhMKaMQDNiJmQFe+M50HM-TfPtOx_iw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171026213337.kbmwnaxlsyubat4w@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote:
>> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>> Tigran Mkrtchyan wrote:
>
>>>> In some workflows we have no control on how git command is executed,
>>>> however a signed tags are required.
>>>
>>> Don't leave me hanging: this leaves me super curious. Can you tell me
>>> more about these workflows?
>>
>> Well, this is a build/release process where we can't pass additional
>> command line options to git. TO be hones, is case of annotated tags
>> there is already option tag.forceSignAnnotated. However, non annotated
>> tags are not forced to be signed.
>>
>> Additionally, the proposed option is symmetric with commit.gpgSign.
>
> Now I'm even more curious.
I started digging and found
https://public-inbox.org/git/20131105112840.GZ4589@mars-attacks.org/
which is an answer to "Why do we have commit.gpgSign?" which is
a very similar question to begin with.
Maybe the answer is also similar (bonus points if the answer also touches
when to prefer one over the other)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-26 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-26 19:55 [PATCH] tag: add tag.gpgSign config option to force all tags be GPG-signed Tigran Mkrtchyan
2017-10-26 20:55 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-10-26 21:01 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
2017-10-26 21:33 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-10-26 21:45 ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2017-10-27 7:41 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
2017-10-28 17:17 ` brian m. carlson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGZ79kZahLWdYJ2poi1QhMKaMQDNiJmQFe+M50HM-TfPtOx_iw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).