From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/5] pathspec magic extension to search for attributes
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 14:25:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kYx_pX81bmpyXCvJSVsZW=t3VpBizUPQ90Wz9=HdG42UA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqshxdhi76.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
>
>> (B) requires some thought though. Here is my vision:
>>
>> 1) Allow pathspecs for sparse checkout.
>>
>> I wonder if we just add support for that in .git/info-sparse-checkout
>> or if we add a new file that is for pathspecs only, or we have a config
>> option whether sparse-checkout follows pathspecs or gitignore patterns
>>
>> 2) Teach `git clone` a new option `--sparse-checkout <pathspec>`
>> When that option is set the pathspec is written into the new file from
>> (1) and core.sparsecheckout is set to true
>>
>> 3) Advertise to do a `git clone --sparse-checkout
>> :(attr:default_submodules)`
>>
>> Going this way we would help making submodules not different but integrate more
>> into other concepts of Git. As a downside this would require touching
>> sparse checkout which may be more time consuming than just adding a
>> `git clone --init-submodules-by-label` which stores the labels and only upddates
>> those submodules.
>>
>> Or are there other ideas how to go from here?
>
> My take is to pretend sparse checkout does not exist at all and then
> go from there ;-) It is a poorly designed and implemented "concept"
> that we do not want to spread around.
>
> You were going to add defaultGroup and teach 'clone' (and other
> commands) about it, and have clone find submodules in that Group,
> right?
Right. But upon finding the new name for clone, I wondered why
this has to be submodule specific. The attr pathspecs are also working
with any other files. So if you don't use submodules, I think it would be
pretty cool to have a
git clone --sparse-checkout=Documentation/ ...
> Isn't the pathspec magic just another way to introduce
> how you express the "defaultGroup", i.e. not with the "label" thing
> in .gitmodules, but with pathspec elements with attribute magic?
Right. So instead I could do a
git clone --recursive --restrict-submodules-to=<pathspec> --save-restriction
and then later on
git submodule update --use-restriction-saved-by-clone
I think we'd not want more than that for some first real tests
by some engineers.
However after thinking about this for a while I think it's too
submodule centric? The more special sauce we add for submodules
the harder they will be to maintain/support as they grow into their own
thing down the road.
Using these pathspec attrs are a good example for why we would
want to make it more generic. Imagine a future, where more attributes
can be codified into pathspecs and this is one of the possibilities:
git clone --sparse=":(exclude,size>5MB,binary)
which would not checkout files that are large binary files. We could
also extend the protocol (v2 with the capabilities in client speaks first)
to transmit such a requirement to the server.
Why is sparseness considered bad?
(I did find only limited resources on the net, those bogs I found are
advertising it as the last remainder Git needed to be superior to svn in
any discipline; I did not find a lot of negative feedback on it. So I guess
usability and confusion?)
If I wanted to just do the submodule only thing, this would be a smaller
series, I would guess.
Thanks,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-19 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-19 1:09 [PATCHv8 0/5] pathspec magic extension to search for attributes Stefan Beller
2016-05-19 1:09 ` [PATCHv8 1/5] string list: improve comment Stefan Beller
2016-05-19 18:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-19 18:12 ` Stefan Beller
2016-05-19 1:09 ` [PATCHv8 2/5] Documentation: fix a typo Stefan Beller
2016-05-19 1:09 ` [PATCHv8 3/5] pathspec: move long magic parsing out of prefix_pathspec Stefan Beller
2016-05-19 1:09 ` [PATCHv8 4/5] pathspec: move prefix check out of the inner loop Stefan Beller
2016-05-19 1:09 ` [PATCHv8 5/5] pathspec: allow querying for attributes Stefan Beller
2016-05-19 18:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-19 20:42 ` Stefan Beller
2016-05-19 21:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-19 19:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCHv8 0/5] pathspec magic extension to search " Junio C Hamano
2016-05-19 21:00 ` Stefan Beller
2016-05-19 21:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-19 21:25 ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2016-05-20 17:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-20 18:12 ` Stefan Beller
2016-05-20 18:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-22 11:45 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-05-23 18:49 ` Stefan Beller
2016-05-24 2:00 ` Duy Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGZ79kYx_pX81bmpyXCvJSVsZW=t3VpBizUPQ90Wz9=HdG42UA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).