From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] compiling git with gcc -O3 -Wuninitialized
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:07:54 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACsJy8BqOEvEHy7i89fKSgQH5kUYFWvchJwD_fQsYjagrh+X2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121214220903.GA18418@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> I always compile git with "gcc -Wall -Werror", because it catches a lot
> of dubious constructs, and we usually keep the code warning-free.
> However, I also typically compile with "-O0" because I end up debugging
> a fair bit.
>
> Sometimes, though, I compile with -O3, which yields a bunch of new
> "variable might be used uninitialized" warnings. What's happening is
> that as functions get inlined, the compiler can do more static analysis
> of the variables. So given two functions like:
>
> int get_foo(int *foo)
> {
> if (something_that_might_fail() < 0)
> return error("unable to get foo");
> *foo = 0;
> return 0;
> }
>
> void some_fun(void)
> {
> int foo;
> if (get_foo(&foo) < 0)
> return -1;
> printf("foo is %d\n", foo);
> }
>
> If get_foo() is not inlined, then when compiling some_fun, gcc sees only
> that a pointer to the local variable is passed, and must assume that it
> is an out parameter that is initialized after get_foo returns.
>
> However, when get_foo() is inlined, the compiler may look at all of the
> code together and see that some code paths in get_foo() do not
> initialize the variable. And we get the extra warnings.
Other options:
- Any __attribute__ or #pragma to aid flow analysis (or would gcc dev be
willing to add one)?
- Maintain a list of false positives and filter them out from gcc output?
And if we do this, should we support other compilers as well? I tried
clang once a long while ago and got a bunch of warnings iirc.
--
Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-15 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-14 22:09 [PATCH/RFC 0/3] compiling git with gcc -O3 -Wuninitialized Jeff King
2012-12-14 22:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] remote-testsvn: fix unitialized variable Jeff King
2012-12-15 10:29 ` Florian Achleitner
2012-12-14 22:12 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/3] inline error functions with constant returns Jeff King
2012-12-14 22:13 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/3] silence some -Wuninitialized warnings around errors Jeff King
2012-12-15 3:07 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [this message]
2012-12-15 10:09 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/3] compiling git with gcc -O3 -Wuninitialized Jeff King
2012-12-15 10:49 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-12-15 11:09 ` Jeff King
2012-12-15 17:36 ` [PATCH/RFCv2 0/2] " Jeff King
2012-12-15 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] make error()'s constant return value more visible Jeff King
2012-12-15 17:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] silence some -Wuninitialized false positives Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACsJy8BqOEvEHy7i89fKSgQH5kUYFWvchJwD_fQsYjagrh+X2w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).