From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>,
Manlio Perillo <manlio.perillo@gmail.com>,
"W. Trevor King" <wking@drexel.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clone: forbid --bare --separate-git-dir <dir>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:34:21 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACsJy8B=h04QAeb0D-PWvT=0n_+QfW27NuUg3KEFUN3C4MOJVQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v4nirfu1p.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> writes:
>
>> Am 08.01.2013 15:16, schrieb Duy Nguyen:
>>> On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 02:19:48AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>>> Unfortunately we forgot to forbid the --bare
>>>> --separate-git-dir combination. In practice, we know no one
>>>> could be using --bare with --separate-git-dir because it is
>>>> broken in the following way: <explanation here>. So it is
>>>> safe to make good on our mistake and forbid the combination,
>>>> making the command easier to explain.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know what would go in the <explanation here> blank above,
>>>> though. Is it possible that some people are relying on this option
>>>> combination?
>>>
>>> I can't say it's broken in what way. Maybe it's easier to just support
>>> this case, it's not much work anyway. Jens, maybe squash this to your
>>> original patch?
>>
>> I'd be fine with that, though my gut feeling is that this should
>> be a patch of its own (My patch handles the git dir, your's handles
>> a work tree issue).
>
> I agree that these are totally unrelated issues.
>
> After all, Jonathan's suggestion to forbid it was because the
> combination does not make sense and does not have practical uses,
> and forbidding it would make the command easier to explain than
> leaving it accepted from the command line. If you choose to go in
> the opposite direction and make "clone --bare --separate-git-dir" do
> something useful, it should be explained very well in the
> documentation part of the patch why such a combination is a good
> idea, and in what situation the behaviour is useful and the user may
> want to consider using it, I think.
It is more like postponing the usefulness evaluation of the
combination until later (maybe someone will come up with an actual use
case). As of now, --separate-git-dir --bare is a valid combination.
Jens' patch fixes one case but leave the other case broken, which is
why I think it should be in one patch. It's rather ducking head in the
sand than actually declaring that the combination is useful.
--
Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-08 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-04 20:53 [BUG] git submodule update is not fail safe Manlio Perillo
2013-01-04 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-05 13:52 ` Manlio Perillo
2013-01-05 14:07 ` Jens Lehmann
2013-01-05 14:01 ` Jens Lehmann
2013-01-05 14:49 ` Manlio Perillo
2013-01-05 14:50 ` Jens Lehmann
2013-01-05 20:17 ` [PATCH] clone: support atomic operation with --separate-git-dir Jens Lehmann
2013-01-05 21:20 ` Manlio Perillo
2013-01-06 6:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-06 8:49 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-01-06 9:16 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-01-06 9:47 ` [PATCH] clone: forbid --bare --separate-git-dir <dir> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2013-01-06 10:19 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-01-06 23:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-07 1:18 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-01-07 2:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-08 14:16 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-01-08 17:15 ` Jens Lehmann
2013-01-08 17:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-08 23:34 ` Duy Nguyen [this message]
2013-01-08 23:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-11 3:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2013-01-11 3:15 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACsJy8B=h04QAeb0D-PWvT=0n_+QfW27NuUg3KEFUN3C4MOJVQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=hvoigt@hvoigt.net \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=manlio.perillo@gmail.com \
--cc=wking@drexel.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).