git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>
To: Aishwarya Narayanan <aishnana.03@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, christian.couder@gmail.com
Subject: Re: RFC: Move existing tests to a unit testing framework - Seeking Review
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 12:26:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+ARAtpqD0um9bVrjRKG0DmrxVR-46uSKfDKnO+H1rUp0i+4Ww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHCXyj0fn5_sS8FM+US-6trM+_QbCcUnLtx8=4eJdFe=rXxkQQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Aishwarya Narayanan,

Thank you for your proposal.

On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 8:08 PM Aishwarya Narayanan
<aishnana.03@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This project's goal is to adapt the existing "reftable" unit tests to
> use the new unit testing framework. This conversion will assure
> codebase continuity, increase test readability and maintainability,
> and allow for the use of the new framework's additional features and
> capabilities.
>

Your project summary and the deliverables below seem to mention that you're
going to work on migration of the reftable unit tests but the project
title seems
to be "Move existing tests to a unit testing framework'.

Just to be clear, the "Move existing tests to a unit testing framework" and the
"Convert reftable unit tests to use the unit testing framework" are
two different
projects as clarified in the ideas page for Git [1].

If you wish to work on the reftable unit test migration, I request you
to adjust the
proposal to clearly clarify the same. Make sure to understand that the reftable
unit tests differ from the other unit tests in their coding style. You
might also want
to consider them while drafting the proposal. Check the mail from
Patrick[2] for more
information on the same.

[1]: https://git.github.io/SoC-2024-Ideas/
[2]: https://public-inbox.org/git/ZfwnrL6Zl_lcV09y@tanuki/

--
Sivaraam


      reply	other threads:[~2024-04-02  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-30 14:38 RFC: Move existing tests to a unit testing framework - Seeking Review Aishwarya Narayanan
2024-04-02  6:56 ` Kaartic Sivaraam [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+ARAtpqD0um9bVrjRKG0DmrxVR-46uSKfDKnO+H1rUp0i+4Ww@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com \
    --cc=aishnana.03@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).