git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Optimizing writes to unchanged files during merges?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:55:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFw5mpEcEpPTOWych-kjNLc8pEn8FdjJHe2u7HUBBLy-Fw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwM2CaafNGq8_=GkYAw9inpm-4xcyHUmKprLv4Gb3-aVg@mail.gmail.com>

[ Talking to myself ]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Oddly, that *already* has the check:
>
>         if (mfi.clean && !df_conflict_remains &&
>             oid_eq(&mfi.oid, a_oid) && mfi.mode == a_mode) {
>                 int path_renamed_outside_HEAD;
>                 output(o, 3, _("Skipped %s (merged same as existing)"), path);
>
> but that doesn't seem to actually trigger for some reason.

Actually, that check triggers just fine.

> But the code really seems to have the _intention_ of skipping the case
> where the result ended up the same as the source.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something.

The later check that does

                /*
                 * The content merge resulted in the same file contents we
                 * already had.  We can return early if those file contents
                 * are recorded at the correct path (which may not be true
                 * if the merge involves a rename).
                 */
                path_renamed_outside_HEAD = !path2 || !strcmp(path, path2);
                if (!path_renamed_outside_HEAD) {

will see that 'path2' is NULL, and not trigger this early out case,
and then this all falls back to the normal cases after all.

So I think that 'path_renamed_outside_HEAD' logic is somehow broken.

Did it perhaps mean to say

                path_renamed_outside_HEAD = path2 && !strcmp(path, path2);

instead?

See commit 5b448b853 ("merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an
update, actually skip it") which really implies we want to actually
skip it (but then we don't anyway).

Also see commit b2c8c0a76 ("merge-recursive: When we detect we can
skip an update, actually skip it") which was an earlier version, and
which *actually* skipped it, but it was reverted because of that
rename issue.

Adding Elijah Newren to the cc, because he was working on this back
then, an dis still around, and still working on merging ;)

               Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-12 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-12 21:14 Optimizing writes to unchanged files during merges? Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12 21:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-12 23:17   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-12 23:35     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12 23:41       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12 23:55         ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2018-04-13  0:01           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13  7:02             ` Elijah Newren
2018-04-13 17:14               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 17:39                 ` Stefan Beller
2018-04-13 17:53                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 20:04                 ` Elijah Newren
2018-04-13 22:27                   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-16  1:44                 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-16  2:03                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-16 16:07                     ` Lars Schneider
2018-04-16 17:04                       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-04-17 17:23                         ` Lars Schneider
2018-04-16 17:43                       ` Jacob Keller
2018-04-16 17:45                         ` Jacob Keller
2018-04-16 22:34                           ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-17 17:27                           ` Lars Schneider
2018-04-17 17:43                             ` Jacob Keller
2018-04-16 17:47                       ` Phillip Wood
2018-04-16 20:09                       ` Stefan Haller
2018-04-16 22:55                     ` Elijah Newren
2018-04-16 23:03                   ` Elijah Newren
2018-04-12 23:18   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13  0:01 ` Elijah Newren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+55aFw5mpEcEpPTOWych-kjNLc8pEn8FdjJHe2u7HUBBLy-Fw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).