git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fwd: [PATCH 1/5] diff_tree_sha1: skip diff_tree if old == new
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 13:38:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=hJm4ax__5DDCvK9VdLcNxVO2bVA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinPSqDPdGi5nA3sH1D2wMSW1SQc+5gRqdLy++y0@mail.gmail.com>

Forgot to forward this to the list as well, I apologize.

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> This was seen to happen in some invocations of git-log with a filtered
>> path. Only do it if we are not recursively descending, as otherwise we
>> mess with copy and rename detection in full tree moves.
>
> There is no code that corresponds to your "Only do it..." description in
> your patch, though.  The existing code already takes care of that part
> with or without your patch, no?

Damn, I forgot to update the message- see below.

>> diff --git a/tree-diff.c b/tree-diff.c
>> index 76f83fc..ab90f1a 100644
>> --- a/tree-diff.c
>> +++ b/tree-diff.c
>> @@ -286,6 +286,9 @@ int diff_tree_sha1(const unsigned char *old, const unsigned char *new, const cha
>>       unsigned long size1, size2;
>>       int retval;
>>
>> +     if (!DIFF_OPT_TST(opt, FIND_COPIES_HARDER) && !hashcmp(old, new))
>> +             return 0;
>> +
>
> I am very curious why this patch makes a difference; doesn't an existing
> test in compare_tree_entry() oalready cull extra recursion?  There is:

This was originally testing RECURSIVE; however I discovered that was
not the culprit to my failed tests.

t9300-fastimport.sh was failing on "copy then modify subdirectory" due
to the full info not being loaded for the before sha1 in that test-
instead of showing the fcf778cda ... C100 part (this is just the first
line of expected, all were the same), it was 000000 ... A. once I
added the above fallthrough to not shortcut if this option was
enabled, things worked fine and all tests passed.

>        if (!DIFF_OPT_TST(opt, FIND_COPIES_HARDER) && !hashcmp(sha1, sha2) &&
>                mode1 == mode2)
>                return 0;
>
> before a recursive call to diff_tree_sha1() to dig deeper.
>

I'm not totally sure why this check wasn't working, but without the
above exception my patch definitely broke tests.

-Dan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-02 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-31  1:37 [PATCH 1/5] diff_tree_sha1: skip diff_tree if old == new Dan McGee
2011-03-31  1:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] tree-walk: drop unused parameter from match_dir_prefix Dan McGee
2011-08-30 18:55   ` Dan McGee
2011-03-31  1:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] tree-walk: micro-optimization in tree_entry_interesting Dan McGee
2011-04-03  4:01   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-04-03 18:55   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-04-05  0:22     ` Dan McGee
     [not found]       ` <CAEik5nOKrpFycZYVnSu4_5LYWxn0JS_hVXyiQH-80Bu-C4k8VQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-08-30 19:51         ` Dan McGee
2011-08-30 20:40           ` Junio C Hamano
2011-09-09  2:02             ` [PATCH 1/2] tree-walk: drop unused parameter from match_dir_prefix Dan McGee
2011-09-09  2:02               ` [PATCH 2/2] tree-walk: micro-optimization in tree_entry_interesting Dan McGee
2011-04-04 14:46   ` [PATCH] tree_entry_interesting: inline strncmp() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-03-31  1:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] tree-walk: unroll get_mode since loop boundaries are well-known Dan McGee
2011-04-02  9:28   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-04-02 17:28     ` Dan McGee
2011-04-03  4:07       ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-04-04 10:29   ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-04-04 12:30     ` Andreas Ericsson
2011-04-04 16:55   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-04-05  5:33     ` Dan McGee
2011-04-05 23:55       ` Antriksh Pany
2011-04-06 20:45         ` Dan McGee
2011-03-31  1:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] tree-walk: match_entry microoptimization Dan McGee
2011-04-02  9:06   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-04-02 17:54     ` Dan McGee
2011-03-31 12:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] diff_tree_sha1: skip diff_tree if old == new Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-03-31 13:56   ` Dan McGee
2011-04-01 22:28 ` Junio C Hamano
     [not found]   ` <AANLkTinPSqDPdGi5nA3sH1D2wMSW1SQc+5gRqdLy++y0@mail.gmail.com>
2011-04-02 18:38     ` Dan McGee [this message]
2011-05-03  7:34 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTi=hJm4ax__5DDCvK9VdLcNxVO2bVA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dpmcgee@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).