git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] parse_object: pass on the original sha1, not the replaced one
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:02:40 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinmJ0=VxFAaCXNjB2WAiPYHq3jXmRnzVoEiw_-f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201008130559.33640.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Christian Couder
<chriscool@tuxfamily.org> wrote:
> On Saturday 07 August 2010 06:03:05 Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Christian Couder
>>
>> <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> wrote:
>> > It looks like parse_commit() is buggy regarding replaced objects. But I
>> > am not sure how it should be fixed.
>>
>> It could be fixed the same way you did with parse_object(): replace
>> read_sha1_file() with read_sha1_file_repl(). You would also need to
>> fix parse_tree() and parse_tag(). But..
>>
>> > Anyway if you use parse_object(), then you don't need parse_commit(). So
>> > if possible you should use parse_object() instead of both
>> > lookup_commit() and parse_commit().
>>
>> That's how those functions are used. For example, in
>> traverse_commit_list(), lookup_*() may be called and uninteresting
>> objects marked UNINTERESTING. Later on in process_{tree,blob,tag},
>> parse_* may be called if their content is interesting.
>>
>> To me, the fix above will leave a gap when object->sha1 is the
>> original sha1, until parse_*() is called. It just does not sound good.
>
> What do you think about adding a parse_commit_repl() function like the patch
> below and then using it instead of parse_commit()?

How do you plan to use this new function? #define parse_commit(c)
parse_commit_repl(c) or use the new function explictly when needed?

You are going to need parse_tree_repl() too unless you declare
tree/blob replacement is not supported and make git-replace refuse
blob/tree replacement.

Another thing to address is, there will be a duration between
lookup_commit() and parse_commit_repl(), where object.sha1 is the
original one. If it is saved elsewhere, troubles are ahead.

> ------- >8 ---------------------------------------------------
>
> diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
> index 652c1ba..183a735 100644
> --- a/commit.c
> +++ b/commit.c
> @@ -316,6 +316,50 @@ int parse_commit(struct commit *item)
>        return ret;
>  }
>
> +int parse_commit_repl(struct commit **commit)
> +{
> +       enum object_type type;
> +       void *buffer;
> +       unsigned long size;
> +       int ret;
> +       const unsigned char *repl;
> +       struct commit *item = *commit;
> +
> +       if (!item)
> +               return -1;
> +       if (item->object.parsed)
> +               return 0;
> +       buffer = read_sha1_file_repl(item->object.sha1, &type, &size, &repl);
> +       if (!buffer)
> +               return error("Could not read %s",
> +                            sha1_to_hex(item->object.sha1));
> +
> +       if (item->object.sha1 != repl) {
> +               struct commit *repl_item = lookup_commit(repl);
> +               if (!repl_item) {
> +                       free(buffer);
> +                       return error("Bad replacement %s for commit %s",
> +                                    sha1_to_hex(repl),
> +                                    sha1_to_hex(item->object.sha1));
> +               }

You need to use lookup_object() instead here. lookup_commit() wil
create new object if "repl" is not found.
-- 
Duy

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-13  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-31 12:36 [PATCH RFC] parse_object: pass on the original sha1, not the replaced one Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2010-08-02  7:42 ` Christian Couder
2010-08-02  9:31   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-08-03  5:00     ` Christian Couder
2010-08-03  6:01       ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-08-04 11:58         ` Christian Couder
2010-08-04 12:42           ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-08-04 12:57             ` Christian Couder
2010-08-04 22:07               ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-08-05 11:41                 ` Christian Couder
2010-08-07  4:03                   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-08-13  3:59                     ` Christian Couder
2010-08-13  9:02                       ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [this message]
2010-08-14  2:03                         ` Christian Couder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTinmJ0=VxFAaCXNjB2WAiPYHq3jXmRnzVoEiw_-f@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).