Re: [PATCH 3/4] diffcore-delta.c: LLP64 compatibility, upcast unity for left shift

[Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>]

On 29/11/2021 14:44, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> On 11/26/2021 6:36 AM, Philip Oakley wrote:
>> Visual Studio reports C4334 "was 64-bit shift intended" warning
>> because of size miss-match.
>>
>> Promote unity to the matching type to fit with its subsequent operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
>> ---
>>  diffcore-delta.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/diffcore-delta.c b/diffcore-delta.c
>> index 5668ace60d..a4e86dfa38 100644
>> --- a/diffcore-delta.c
>> +++ b/diffcore-delta.c
>> @@ -133,10 +133,10 @@ static struct spanhash_top *hash_chars(struct repository *r,
>>  
>>  	i = INITIAL_HASH_SIZE;
>>  	hash = xmalloc(st_add(sizeof(*hash),
>> -			      st_mult(sizeof(struct spanhash), 1<<i)));
>> +			      st_mult(sizeof(struct spanhash), (size_t)1<<i)));
> This could use spaces around "<<"
OK.
>
>>  	hash->alloc_log2 = i;
>>  	hash->free = INITIAL_FREE(i);
>> -	memset(hash->data, 0, sizeof(struct spanhash) * (1<<i));
>> +	memset(hash->data, 0, sizeof(struct spanhash) * ((size_t)1 << i));
> Especially because you correctly add them here.
True. The spacing isn't that consistent in the code base, but adding the
spaces here does look better.
>
> Thanks,
> -Stolee

Philip