git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Carl Baldwin <cnb@fc.hp.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sha1_file: add the ability to parse objects in "pack file format"
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:47:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vlkqz3jb1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607111241460.5623@g5.osdl.org> (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:48:08 -0700 (PDT)")

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:

> Here's a newer verson of [2/3], with these issues fixed. It actually fixes 
> things twice: (a) by parsing the binary version first (which makes sense 
> for a totally independent reason - if that is going to be the "default" 
> version in the long run, we should just test it first anyway) and (b) by 
> making the ASCII version parser stricter too.

Wait a minute.

 read-sha1-file maps sha1-file-internal (for unpacked one), and then
 calls unpack-sha1-file.

 unpack-sha1-file calls unpack-sha1-header to start inflation,
 lets parse-sha1-header to read the header in the inflated
 buffer, and calls unpack-sha1-rest to inflate the rest.

But in packs, we have binary header not deflated, followed by
deflated payload.  If we want to copy things from loose objects
into pack without changing the packfile format, this change
would not help, I suspect.

At least, your updated unpack_sha1_file() needs to check for
binary header first (starting from "map"), and if that starts
with binary header, start inflating after the header to extract
the payload.  Otherwise you would do the traditional.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-11 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-10 23:01 Revisiting large binary files issue Carl Baldwin
2006-07-10 23:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-11  6:20   ` Peter Baumann
2006-07-10 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11  9:40   ` [RFC]: Pack-file object format for individual objects (Was: Revisiting large binary files issue.) sf
2006-07-11 18:00     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11 21:45       ` sf
2006-07-11 22:17         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11 22:26           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11 14:55   ` Revisiting large binary files issue Carl Baldwin
2006-07-11 17:09     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11 17:10       ` [PATCH 1/3] Make the unpacked object header functions static to sha1_file.c Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11 17:12       ` [PATCH 2/3] sha1_file: add the ability to parse objects in "pack file format" Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11 18:40         ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-11 18:58           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11 19:20             ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-11 19:48               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11 21:25                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-11 21:47                 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2006-07-11 21:24         ` sf
2006-07-11 22:09           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11 22:25             ` sf
2006-07-11 23:03             ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-12  0:03               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-12  0:39                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-12  3:45                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-12  4:31                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-12  6:35                     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-12 16:29                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-12  0:46                 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-12  3:42                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-12  6:49                 ` Peter Baumann
2006-07-12  7:16                   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-12  8:28                     ` Peter Baumann
2006-07-12 15:13                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-12 15:27                     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-11 17:16       ` [PATCH 3/3] Enable the new binary header format for unpacked objects Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vlkqz3jb1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
    --to=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=cnb@fc.hp.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).