Re: [preview] diff-helper rename detection.

[Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>]

>>>>> "LT" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:

LT> I suspect that one tweak may be to try to find the "best" rename first,
LT> rather than look at files in the order they were discovered (ie you'd
LT> create a _matrix_ of the delta scores, rather than walk through the newly
LT> created files in order). That would then potentially allow for a more
LT> relaxed definitions of "rename", without any possibility of losing sight
LT> of a better rename due to finding a bad one first.

I thought about that but I opted for simplicity of first picking
the exact matches.  I was unsure about the usefulness of relaxed
matching to begin with.  But I now realize that to see how useful
that would be we need to experiment it and a matrix approach
would become necessity for that.

LT> So my only nit so far is that you declare "patch_delta()",
LT> even though you don't actually have it. Just remove it.

I'd rather keep that file as is for later merge with Nico.  It
came from the delitification patch and I tried to keep the new
files as they are.