From: <steve.norman@thomsonreuters.com>
To: <pclouds@gmail.com>, <peff@peff.net>
Cc: <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Troubleshoot clone issue to NFS.
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:01:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7FAE15F0A93C0144AD8B5FBD584E1C55197764FE@C111KXTEMBX51.ERF.thomson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8Bb1O7QZtiPWdzYwYgOdV0dLDgD3Xu_YaWNUbsuTqJB5g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sunday, May 24, 2015 @ 10:01 AM Duy Nguyen [mailto:pclouds@gmail.com] did scribble:
> In case you want to back away from option 2 because it starts to leak
> raciness, which your old commit tried to fix in the first place. I
> think the only other place that tests for lots of non-existent loose
> objects is write_sha1_file (e.g. "tar -xf bigtarball.tar.gz; cd
> bigtarball; git init; git add ."). But the number of calls should be
> much smaller compared to index-pack and it does not use has_sha1_file,
> it uses check_and_freshen_file() instead.
>
> There are other places where has_sha1_file() may return 0, but I think
> the number of calls is even smaller to bother (shallow.c,
> fetch-pack.c, apply.c, buik-checkin.c)
Any updates / further thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-05 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 13:13 Troubleshoot clone issue to NFS steve.norman
2015-05-21 14:00 ` Christian Couder
2015-05-21 14:31 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-05-21 14:38 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-05-21 15:53 ` steve.norman
2015-05-22 0:16 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-05-22 7:12 ` Jeff King
2015-05-22 8:35 ` steve.norman
2015-05-22 10:05 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-05-22 14:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-22 15:02 ` steve.norman
2015-05-22 23:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/3] using stat() to avoid re-scanning pack dir Jeff King
2015-05-22 23:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] stat_validity: handle non-regular files Jeff King
2015-05-23 11:00 ` Michael Haggerty
2015-05-24 8:29 ` Jeff King
2015-05-22 23:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] cache.h: move stat_validity definition up Jeff King
2015-05-22 23:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] prepare_packed_git: use stat_validity to avoid re-reading packs Jeff King
2015-05-23 1:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/3] using stat() to avoid re-scanning pack dir Duy Nguyen
2015-05-23 1:21 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-05-24 8:20 ` Jeff King
2015-05-24 9:00 ` Troubleshoot clone issue to NFS Duy Nguyen
2015-06-05 12:01 ` steve.norman [this message]
2015-06-05 12:18 ` Jeff King
2015-06-05 12:29 ` [PATCH] index-pack: avoid excessive re-reading of pack directory Jeff King
2015-06-09 17:24 ` Jeff King
2015-06-09 17:41 ` Jeff King
2015-06-10 3:46 ` Shawn Pearce
2015-06-10 14:00 ` Jeff King
2015-06-10 14:36 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-06-10 21:34 ` Shawn Pearce
2015-06-05 14:20 ` Troubleshoot clone issue to NFS steve.norman
2015-06-16 20:50 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7FAE15F0A93C0144AD8B5FBD584E1C55197764FE@C111KXTEMBX51.ERF.thomson.com \
--to=steve.norman@thomsonreuters.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).