git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Haller <lists@haller-berlin.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Allow git bisect to auto-skip
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 19:33:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7556a3de-a6a6-4284-8c36-3635ae43c653@schinagl.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq8r27sclp.fsf@gitster.g>

On 24-03-2024 19:34, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Also, how much better would this be compared to tracking  "git bisect
>> run" scripts in the repo, even if they have to be copied somewhere
>> else before they are launched? I wonder about this because writing the
>> conditions that decide whether the current commit is good or bad might
>> not be so easy either. So if the goal is to simplify things for users,
>> then simplifying all the way by providing example scripts with
>> comments about how they could be customized might be even better.
> 
> If we are driving our bisection session via "bisect run" script,
> computing the condition that we need to skip in the script is the
> most natural and obvious thing to do, but the way I guessed (because
> it was not explicitly written down) what the OP wanted was a way for
> bisect_next() called after even a manual "git bisect (good|bad)" to
> automatically skip certain set of commits.

I think you understood what I failed to properly explain :)

To come up with an RFC, I was trying to study the git code, and while 
some things are quite readable, others are a bit complex.

After some poking, I was thinking of using `find_bisection()`, or rather 
`do_find_bisection()` but got lost there.

What made sense initially was, that in `find_bisection()` there is a 
simple for loop that goes over the list of commits to count them. But 
writing this down, I realize the list of commits is already there in 
`struct commit_list *list`, so I should probably go find out where the 
list is being created!

Anyway, want I was thinking of, based a key somewhere in the message 
body (GIT_BISECT_SKIP=1 for example), mark the commit in the list to be 
skipped, as `git bisect skip` would. This so the skipped commit actualyl 
ends up on the list of skipped commits (`refs/bisect/skip-*`).

But being a bit lost, it would be nice to get some directional pointers.

Is this even possible? What is the easiest way to get the message from 
the `struct commit_list *list` item, are there helpers to parse the 
message at all?

Thanks,
Olliver

>  Because there are cases
> where you have to be testing manually and cannot afford to write
> "bisect run" script, giving a manual bisection a way to compute if a
> commit need to be skipped may be worth having, and that was where my
> "git bisect --skip-when <script>" came from.  It would not be
> necessary if you are doing "bisect run", which can dynamically tell
> if the commit is untestable.  And if the user is going to decide
> after manually testing the one that is suggested, it is not useful
> either, as the point would be to avoid even asking to test ones that
> need to be skipped.  So it is likely that the set of commits that
> need skipping is known a-priori before the bisect session even
> begins.  The end user experience may look like:
> 
>   * "git bisect start" takes "--skip-when <script>" and remembers it,
>     together with other options "start" can take (like <good>, <bad>,
>     <terms>, <pathspec>).
> 
>   - If <good> and <bad> are already given upon "start", the command
>     may check out a revision and ask you to test.
> 
>   * Every time the command checks out a revision to be tested by the
>     user, the command guarantees if it satisfies the --skip-when
>     condition (and internally doing "git bisect skip").
> 
>   * Otherwise the interaction between the user and the session is
>     exactly the same as usual.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-27 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-22 22:18 Allow git bisect to auto-skip Olliver Schinagl
2024-03-22 22:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-23  1:59   ` Olliver Schinagl
2024-03-23 13:51   ` Stefan Haller
2024-03-23 18:43     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-23 20:51       ` Olliver Schinagl
2024-03-24  7:47         ` Olliver Schinagl
2024-03-24 10:16       ` Stefan Haller
2024-03-24 14:29         ` Christian Couder
2024-03-24 16:04           ` rsbecker
2024-03-24 18:34           ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-27 18:33             ` Olliver Schinagl [this message]
2024-03-27 19:24               ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-28  8:01                 ` Olliver Schinagl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7556a3de-a6a6-4284-8c36-3635ae43c653@schinagl.nl \
    --to=oliver@schinagl.nl \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=lists@haller-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).