git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: vdye@github.com, derrickstolee@github.com, peff@peff.net
Subject: [PATCH] repack: don't remove .keep packs with `--pack-kept-objects`
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 22:26:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a012cd625c1d197ede91c85299cbfb37adf356b.1666059872.git.me@ttaylorr.com> (raw)

`git repack` supports a `--pack-kept-objects` flag which more or less
translates to whether or not we pass `--honor-pack-keep` down to `git
pack-objects` when assembling a new pack.

This behavior has existed since ee34a2bead (repack: add
`repack.packKeptObjects` config var, 2014-03-03). In that commit, the
documentation was extended to say:

    [...] Note that we still do not delete `.keep` packs after
    `pack-objects` finishes.

Unfortunately, this is not the case when `--pack-kept-objects` is
combined with a `--geometric` repack. When doing a geometric repack, we
include `.keep` packs when enumerating available packs only when
`pack_kept_objects` is set.

So this all works fine when `--no-pack-kept-objects` (or similar) is
given. Kept packs are excluded from the geometric roll-up, so when we go
to delete redundant packs (with `-d`), no `.keep` packs appear "below
the split" in our geometric progression.

But when `--pack-kept-objects` is given, things can go awry. Namely,
when a kept pack is included in the list of packs tracked by the
`pack_geometry` struct *and* part of the pack roll-up, we will delete
the `.keep` pack when we shouldn't.

Note that this *doesn't* result in object corruption, since the `.keep`
pack's objects are still present in the new pack. But the `.keep` pack
itself is removed, which violates our promise from back in ee34a2bead.

But there's more. Because `repack` computes the geometric roll-up
independently from selecting which packs belong in a MIDX (with
`--write-midx`), this can lead to odd behavior. Consider when a `.keep`
pack appears below the geometric split (ie., its objects will be part of
the new pack we generate).

We'll write a MIDX containing the new pack along with the existing
`.keep` pack. But because the `.keep` pack appears below the geometric
split line, we'll (incorrectly) try to remove it. While this doesn't
corrupt the repository, it does cause us to remove the MIDX we just
wrote, since removing that pack would invalidate the new MIDX.

Funny enough, this behavior became far less noticeable after e4d0c11c04
(repack: respect kept objects with '--write-midx -b', 2021-12-20), which
made `pack_kept_objects` be enabled by default only when we were writing
a non-MIDX bitmap.

But e4d0c11c04 didn't resolve this bug, it just made it harder to notice
unless callers explicitly passed `--pack-kept-objects`.

The solution is to avoid trying to remove `.keep` packs during
`--geometric` repacks, even when they appear below the geometric split
line, which is the approach this patch implements.

Co-authored-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
---
We at GitHub had a slow stream of repacks that removed the just-written
MIDX.

This had mostly been a mystery that didn't occur at high enough volume
to justify looking into. But it went away entirely after merging in
v2.36.x, which contains e4d0c11c04.

Some investigating with Victoria today led to the patch above, which is
still relevant since e4d0c11c04 papers over an existing bug.

 builtin/repack.c            |  5 +++++
 t/t7700-repack.sh           | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 t/t7703-repack-geometric.sh |  6 +++++-
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/builtin/repack.c b/builtin/repack.c
index a5bacc7797..f71909696d 100644
--- a/builtin/repack.c
+++ b/builtin/repack.c
@@ -1089,6 +1089,11 @@ int cmd_repack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 				strbuf_addstr(&buf, pack_basename(p));
 				strbuf_strip_suffix(&buf, ".pack");

+				if ((p->pack_keep) ||
+				    (string_list_has_string(&existing_kept_packs,
+							    buf.buf)))
+					continue;
+
 				remove_redundant_pack(packdir, buf.buf);
 			}
 			strbuf_release(&buf);
diff --git a/t/t7700-repack.sh b/t/t7700-repack.sh
index ca45c4cd2c..df8e94d7a8 100755
--- a/t/t7700-repack.sh
+++ b/t/t7700-repack.sh
@@ -426,6 +426,30 @@ test_expect_success '--write-midx -b packs non-kept objects' '
 	)
 '

+test_expect_success '--write-midx with --pack-kept-objects' '
+	git init repo &&
+	test_when_finished "rm -fr repo" &&
+	(
+		cd repo &&
+
+		test_commit one &&
+		test_commit two &&
+
+		one="$(echo "one" | git pack-objects --revs $objdir/pack/pack)" &&
+		two="$(echo "one..two" | git pack-objects --revs $objdir/pack/pack)" &&
+
+		keep="$objdir/pack/pack-$one.keep" &&
+		touch "$keep" &&
+
+		git repack --write-midx --write-bitmap-index --geometric=2 -d \
+			--pack-kept-objects &&
+
+		test_path_is_file $keep &&
+		test_path_is_file $midx &&
+		test_path_is_file $midx-$(midx_checksum $objdir).bitmap
+	)
+'
+
 test_expect_success TTY '--quiet disables progress' '
 	test_terminal env GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=0 \
 		git -C midx repack -ad --quiet --write-midx 2>stderr &&
diff --git a/t/t7703-repack-geometric.sh b/t/t7703-repack-geometric.sh
index da87f8b2d8..8821fbd2dd 100755
--- a/t/t7703-repack-geometric.sh
+++ b/t/t7703-repack-geometric.sh
@@ -176,8 +176,12 @@ test_expect_success '--geometric ignores kept packs' '
 		# be repacked, too.
 		git repack --geometric 2 -d --pack-kept-objects &&

+		# After repacking, two packs remain: one new one (containing the
+		# objects in both the .keep and non-kept pack), and the .keep
+		# pack (since `--pack-kept-objects -d` does not actually delete
+		# the kept pack).
 		find $objdir/pack -name "*.pack" >after &&
-		test_line_count = 1 after
+		test_line_count = 2 after
 	)
 '

--
2.38.0.16.g393fd4c6db

             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-18  2:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-18  2:26 Taylor Blau [this message]
2022-10-18  6:54 ` [PATCH] repack: don't remove .keep packs with `--pack-kept-objects` Jeff King
2022-10-21  3:14   ` Taylor Blau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6a012cd625c1d197ede91c85299cbfb37adf356b.1666059872.git.me@ttaylorr.com \
    --to=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=vdye@github.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).