git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>,
	Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] tests: paint known breakages in yellow
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:59:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D49588.60305@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vd2y32ys0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On 12/21/2012 04:46 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
> The only thing the additional knowledge adds seems to be to give
> rationale for the old choice of "bold green"---it was not chosen
> from thin-air but can be viewed as following the automake/autotest
> scheme, and other systems cannot agree on what color to pick for
> this purpose.
> 
> I do not see a need to justify why we chose differently from
> automake/autotest; we could say something like:
> 
>     Yellow seems a more appropriate color than bold green when
>     considering the universal traffic lights coloring scheme, where
>     green conveys the impression that everything's OK, and amber that
>     something's not quite right.  This is in line with what 'prove'
>     uses, but different from 'automake/autotest' do.
> 
> but we are not in the business of choosing which is more correct
> between prove and automake/autotest, and I do not see how it adds
> much value to tell readers that color choices are not universally
> agreed upon across various test software suites---that's kind of
> known, isn't it?
> 
> So...
>
That is fine with me, I just pointed it out because I suspected not
everybody was aware of all these details.  If you decide they don't
matter, it's perfectly OK -- but at least now it's an informed
choice ;-)

Thanks,
  Stefano

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-21 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-16 18:28 [PATCH v6 0/7] make test output coloring more intuitive Adam Spiers
2012-12-16 18:28 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] tests: test number comes first in 'not ok $count - $message' Adam Spiers
2012-12-16 18:28 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] tests: paint known breakages in bold yellow Adam Spiers
2012-12-16 18:28 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] tests: paint skipped tests in bold blue Adam Spiers
2012-12-16 18:28 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] tests: change info messages from yellow/brown to bold cyan Adam Spiers
2012-12-16 18:28 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] tests: refactor mechanics of testing in a sub test-lib Adam Spiers
2012-12-16 18:28 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] tests: test the test framework more thoroughly Adam Spiers
2012-12-16 18:28 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] tests: paint unexpectedly fixed known breakages in bold red Adam Spiers
2012-12-16 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] make test output coloring more intuitive Junio C Hamano
2012-12-16 19:01   ` Adam Spiers
2012-12-16 23:11     ` Junio C Hamano
2012-12-20 15:34     ` Jeff King
2012-12-20 15:44       ` Adam Spiers
2012-12-20 16:11         ` Jeff King
2012-12-20 18:08           ` Adam Spiers
2012-12-20 19:21           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-12-20 19:50             ` Jeff King
2012-12-20 23:28             ` Adam Spiers
2012-12-21  3:12               ` [PATCH v7 0/7] coloring test output after traffic signal Junio C Hamano
2012-12-21  8:15                 ` Jeff King
2012-12-21 10:00                   ` Adam Spiers
2012-12-21  3:12               ` [PATCH v7 1/7] tests: test number comes first in 'not ok $count - $message' Junio C Hamano
2012-12-21  3:12               ` [PATCH v7 2/7] tests: paint known breakages in yellow Junio C Hamano
2012-12-21  8:51                 ` Stefano Lattarini
2012-12-21 15:46                   ` Junio C Hamano
2012-12-21 16:59                     ` Stefano Lattarini [this message]
2012-12-21  3:12               ` [PATCH v7 3/7] tests: paint skipped tests in blue Junio C Hamano
2012-12-21  3:12               ` [PATCH v7 4/7] tests: change info messages from yellow/brown to cyan Junio C Hamano
2012-12-21  3:12               ` [PATCH v7 5/7] tests: refactor mechanics of testing in a sub test-lib Junio C Hamano
2012-12-21  3:12               ` [PATCH v7 6/7] tests: test the test framework more thoroughly Junio C Hamano
2012-12-21  3:12               ` [PATCH v7 7/7] tests: paint unexpectedly fixed known breakages in bold red Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50D49588.60305@gmail.com \
    --to=stefano.lattarini@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@adamspiers.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).