Re: [PATCH] mailmap: resurrect lower-casing of email addresses

[A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>]

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, A Large Angry SCM wrote:
> 
>> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, A Large Angry SCM wrote:
>>>
>>>> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>>>> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> What part of the email address is this going to lowercase? 
>>>>>>> Only the domain name is case agnostic.
>>>>> That is my understanding of RFC, too.  Let's see where this mail 
>>>>> goes to find out how much more lenient the real world is ;-).
>>>>>
>>>> Many email providers/servers are lenient when it comes to case in 
>>>> the local part of an email address (after all, they control the 
>>>> interpretation) but not every provider/server is and the RFC is VERY 
>>>> clear on this issue.
>>> And in one of my projects it is _very_ clear that this strict 
>>> interpretation of the RFC, which does not matter in reality, 
>>> _actively_ _hurts_.
>> Care to provide actual justification for that statement.
> 
> Well, I _did_!  I have at least _one_ repository where the case 
> insensitive email addresses worked, and got fscked over, by having Git 
> change behavior behind my back!
> 
>>> In the alternative, can I ask you to adjust my .mailmap in your free 
>>> time?
>> _Your_ .mailmap file is your issue.
>>
>> So which standards do you choose to follow and which do you choose to 
>> ignore?
> 
> You chose a rather inappropriate moment to start one of those damned 
> flamewars -- I am in the middle of some rather important day-job meeting, 
> plus two projects in the deadline-is-looming GSoC frenzy.
> 
> In case it was not clear yet: if I have to chose between following a 
> standard and reality that just took over, I will _always_ choose the 
> latter.
> 
> If you take this mail to start a flamewar for real (i.e. not answer to my 
> concerns, but point out that standard X says bla, and that everybody else 
> should just obey, oh, and fix their ways as of 20 years), please do remove 
> me from the Cc: list.

This is not worth a flame-war, and Peff has already created a response 
superior to my own, so I'll leave to Junio to find the best(TM) path.