From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: fix incorrect --write-junit-xml code
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:25:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <220715.865yjy1zxa.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq35f38yeb.fsf@gitster.g>
On Thu, Jul 14 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
> writes:
>
>> Unfortunately, I noticed this regression no earlier than when I needed
>> to validate Git for Windows v2.37.1. Since v2.37.1 was an embargoed
>> release, I could not use GitHub Actions for the CI testing, so I had to
>> reinstate Git's Azure Pipeline.
>
> I wonder if it would make your life easier if the same GitHub
> Actions CI stuff were available for the Cabal repository we use for
> embargoed work, by allowing you to use the same validation for usual
> releases and the enbargoed ones?
Isn't it. Looking at
e.g. https://github.com/git/cabal/actions/runs/2284056293 (private link)
that's the CI run for the latest push to "master" (same as
https://github.com/git/git/commit/e8005e4871f130c4e402ddca2032c111252f070a).
So I didn't get this idea that we must have Azure to resurrect for
"private CI", don't we have that already, and anyone can use it by
re-pushing git.git to a private repo (the limitation being that on
GitHub you can't make a private fork of a public repo)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-15 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-14 9:00 [PATCH] tests: fix incorrect --write-junit-xml code Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-07-14 16:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-07-15 9:25 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2022-08-08 13:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-08-08 16:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-09 8:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-08-10 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-12 21:00 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-07-15 9:35 ` never refactor v.s. testing (was: [PATCH] tests: fix incorrect --write-junit-xml code) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=220715.865yjy1zxa.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).