From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B87A1F54E for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="hHKpP3+x"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233542AbiGOJff (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2022 05:35:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52222 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232191AbiGOJfe (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2022 05:35:34 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5476D7B7BD for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 02:35:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id mf4so8018428ejc.3 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 02:35:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:references:user-agent:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=ULYXZWinK37+HTk8RI5f92xLpN5E6FIUUa8Tbcdb140=; b=hHKpP3+xJUDX0jRT+gKgd2AbMR6pGK34Hr5xZYNrVYQaDeNLNj3TNdnTGFr2lQru/e cEIPvrGDBJbJvKK+K9NvAnFZYsZplansojFAYH8rppW0wFqHqjk2QJMwsCaQcTh8ZBiF VNewr5SZVtz9jcL2RvZGuzxhg6xuogzNOwQd70ED7zDwNhR1KNvyjDvD0sTgpZVq6qTf Ndpkl8dRpudcKoqAY1fOzoY2GYoJjSjtDBGMhtfbn7TkTBZ3bhKLK4yYnD3bQ4R+NPW2 GLodkNNH4p/diOqld/5+NoVVCdE4T6z5W1SKSIN/oYWKXYJVzjQG5cVKaAkLoe9spyPj jrDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:references:user-agent :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=ULYXZWinK37+HTk8RI5f92xLpN5E6FIUUa8Tbcdb140=; b=bvAgAlTTZum9pnQMcydSXj/tXto1l4q9yrUitGjl4MyNNG8vP0gC2RACe3xS8VEZAD qg72KwKwC2eWV1uIOhjlT+KlCV55UeF7VbnQwgednvwmsLaoaarHC2+4lID031y82eNN vWAD4SpWRQ9mgt0/XLX2u7SFEWG6QIiqhVJpoH5nqh2pjhBQiqNYS9GqFKyPCZbQltvb CBqA3MyIJV7iRxfeTwULXUlxmy4ZppJ0DLpWFTGjmr2qRn902+p0TgGMZ6vhbjDrV593 QIr6XcpEDQwvr/ExtBfwC+sXw62T6U+7NWAACr1F8rKLE4tQwUVgTk5JO0cam033se3i EaFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9mPmITYqkUm9ZCZJCxxWAjYwsrrmrEvTAMsH2DtvEUmw6HUTG8 pT9tEqNf/1ydUhK84DYzwMrt/OGqSnq+5g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sm+w1ga82XF9DmbMAl1LtHsR4mfAMG0uwk3Erc7DzQZTzjehTvQLehgFugMiWRS0NmBl6jDw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:75e3:b0:72b:198a:b598 with SMTP id jz3-20020a17090775e300b0072b198ab598mr12967209ejc.401.1657877731848; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 02:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmgdl (dhcp-077-248-183-071.chello.nl. [77.248.183.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l9-20020a1709060cc900b007263713cfe9sm1827577ejh.169.2022.07.15.02.35.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Jul 2022 02:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avar by gmgdl with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oCHjN-002cjh-I1; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:35:29 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: fix incorrect --write-junit-xml code Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:25:23 +0200 References: User-agent: Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid; Emacs 27.1; mu4e 1.7.12 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <220715.865yjy1zxa.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 14 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" > writes: > >> Unfortunately, I noticed this regression no earlier than when I needed >> to validate Git for Windows v2.37.1. Since v2.37.1 was an embargoed >> release, I could not use GitHub Actions for the CI testing, so I had to >> reinstate Git's Azure Pipeline. > > I wonder if it would make your life easier if the same GitHub > Actions CI stuff were available for the Cabal repository we use for > embargoed work, by allowing you to use the same validation for usual > releases and the enbargoed ones? Isn't it. Looking at e.g. https://github.com/git/cabal/actions/runs/2284056293 (private link) that's the CI run for the latest push to "master" (same as https://github.com/git/git/commit/e8005e4871f130c4e402ddca2032c111252f070a). So I didn't get this idea that we must have Azure to resurrect for "private CI", don't we have that already, and anyone can use it by re-pushing git.git to a private repo (the limitation being that on GitHub you can't make a private fork of a public repo)?