From: Fernando Ramos <greenfoo@u92.eu>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, davvid@gmail.com, seth@eseth.com,
levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com, rogi@skylittlesystem.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] vimdiff: new layout option + docs
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 17:09:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211104160959.183402-1-greenfoo@u92.eu> (raw)
A few weeks ago I presented this RFC [1] where I introduced a new variant of the
vimdiff merge tool ("vimdiff4") that creates three tabs (instead of just one)
that look like this:
------------------------------------------
| <TAB #1> | TAB #2 | TAB #3 | |
------------------------------------------
| | | |
| LOCAL | BASE | REMOTE |
| | | | <---- Same information
------------------------------------------ presented by the
| | "standard" vimdiff
| MERGED | merge tool
| |
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
| TAB #1 | <TAB #2> | TAB #3 | |
------------------------------------------
| | |
| | |
| | |
| BASE | LOCAL | <---- Only differences
| | | between BASE and
| | | LOCAL are shown
| | |
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
| TAB #1 | TAB #2 | <TAB #3> | |
------------------------------------------
| | |
| | |
| | |
| BASE | REMOTE | <---- Only differences
| | | between BASE and
| | | REMOTE are shown
| | |
------------------------------------------
The motivation behind this was that, for non-trivial merges, the three way diff
presented in the first tab tends to be very confusing and in these cases
indivial diffs between BASE and LOCAL and between BASE and REMOTE are very
useful.
I have been using a "custom" merge tool for months to achieve this same result
by adding these lines to my .gitconfig file:
[mergetool "supermerge"]
cmd = vim -f -d -c \"4wincmd w | wincmd J | tabnew | edit $LOCAL | vertical diffsplit $BASE | tabnew | edit $REMOTE | vertical diffsplit $BASE | 2tabprevious\" \"$LOCAL\" \"$BASE\" \"$REMOTE\" \"$MERGED\"
trustExitCode = true
...and, because I found this "trick" very useful, I thought it would be a good
idea to add it as a git built-in merge tool (called "vimdiff4" because 1, 2 and
3 had already been taken) for everyone to use... and that's exactly what the RFC
I published did.
Now... as you can see in the RFC thread [1], David and Juno suggested that
maybe, instead of creating *yet another vimdiff variant*, we should take this
opportunity to:
* Come up with a more general way of defining arbitrary vim layouts.
* Re-implement "vimdiff1", "vimdiff2" and "vimdiff3" using this new mechanism
(after all, the only difference among them is that they present different
layouts to the user)
* Add documentation to all of this.
And the result of that work is what I'm presenting today :)
Some things I would like to mention:
1. There are three commits in this patch series:
- The first one implements the logic to generate new arbitrary layouts and
also re-defines "vimdiff1", "vimdiff2" and "vimdiff3" on top of it.
- The second one adds documentation. It is probably a good idea to start
reviewing this commit before the first one!
- The last commit *is not meant to be merged now*. It removes "vimdiff1",
"vimdiff2" and "vimdiff3", which is something that should only be done
after one or two releases with a deprecation notice and only if everyone
agrees to do so :)
2. "mergetools/vimdiff" is now a ~800 lines bash script, but most of it is
documentation (which is embedded in the tool itself for easier maintenance)
and unit tests.
I have only tested it with bash, but I've tried not to use any command not
already being used somewhere else, so I expect it to work in the same
places it was working before (however, let me know if there are some shell
compatibility requirements and I'll try to check them).
3. Regarding unit tests, "mergetool/vimdiff" contains instructions on how to
run them (just call the script without arguments after making changes, to
make sure you didn't break anything).
Right now it prints "OK" on all test cases (obviously) [2]
3. The "git {diff,merge}tool --tool-help" command now also prints the
documentation for each tool (instead of just its name, as before).
You can see an example of the output here ([3] and [4])
Finally, let me say that, while I like what this patch series achieves, I would
also *completely* understand if you decide not to merge it due to being a
complex solution to a simple problem that can be solved (as I had been doing up
until today) by just adding three line to one's .gitconfig.
[mergetool "supermerge"]
cmd = vim -f -d -c ...(custom complex sequence of vim commands)...
trustExitCode = true
Let me know what you think.
Thanks.
References:
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20211019212020.25385-1-greenfoo@u92.eu/#r
[2] https://pastebin.com/kuQ5pETG
[3] https://pastebin.com/yvLWxeiM
[4] https://pastebin.com/qNc7qymp
Fernando Ramos (3):
vimdiff: new implementation with layout support
vimdiff: add tool documentation
vimdiff: remove deprecated {,g,n}vimdiff{1,2,3} variants
git-mergetool--lib.sh | 12 +
mergetools/vimdiff | 697 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 677 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
base-commit: 876b1423317071f43c99666f3fc3db3642dfbe14
--
2.33.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-04 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-04 16:09 Fernando Ramos [this message]
2021-11-04 16:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] vimdiff: new implementation with layout support Fernando Ramos
2021-11-07 22:41 ` David Aguilar
2021-11-08 0:47 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-11-04 16:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] vimdiff: add tool documentation Fernando Ramos
2021-11-07 21:24 ` David Aguilar
2021-11-08 1:02 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-11-08 19:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-11-04 16:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] vimdiff: remove deprecated {,g,n}vimdiff{1,2,3} variants Fernando Ramos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211104160959.183402-1-greenfoo@u92.eu \
--to=greenfoo@u92.eu \
--cc=davvid@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com \
--cc=rogi@skylittlesystem.org \
--cc=seth@eseth.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).