From: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, ryenus@gmail.com, stolee@gmail.com,
Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress()
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:03:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191121230326.GW23183@szeder.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191107212614.GC29042@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 04:26:14PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:46:58PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
>
> > From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
> >
> > When writing a commit-graph, we show progress along several commit
> > walks. When we use start_delayed_progress(), the progress line will
> > only appear if that step takes a decent amount of time.
> >
> > However, one place was missed: computing generation numbers. This is
> > normally a very fast operation as all commits have been parsed in a
> > previous step. But, this is showing up for all users no matter how few
> > commits are being added.
>
> This part of the patch is a good thing, and obviously correct. But I
> wondered...
Agreed.
> > The tests that check for the progress output have already been updated
> > to use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=0 to force the expected output. However, there
> > is one test in t6500-gc.sh that uses the test_terminal method. This
> > mechanism does not preserve the GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY environment variable,
>
> Why doesn't GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY make it through? Overall it's not that
> big a deal to me if it doesn't, but in this test:
But I was wondering this, too. If I run the following test:
(
write_script script <<-\EOF &&
echo "GPD: $GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY"
EOF
GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=42 &&
export GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY &&
test_terminal ./script dummy-arg
) &&
then its output looks like this:
+ write_script script
+ GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=42
+ export GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY
+ test_terminal ./script dummy-arg
GPD: 42
So test_terminal does preserve GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-21 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-05 16:05 [PATCH 0/1] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-05 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-05 17:38 ` Derrick Stolee
2019-11-05 20:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-05 20:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-06 4:09 ` Jeff King
2019-11-06 13:21 ` Derrick Stolee
2019-11-07 6:40 ` Jeff King
2019-11-07 13:30 ` Derrick Stolee
2019-11-07 4:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-07 6:43 ` Jeff King
2019-11-07 9:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-07 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-07 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] progress: create GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-07 21:22 ` Jeff King
2019-11-11 14:27 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-11-07 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-07 21:26 ` Jeff King
2019-11-21 23:03 ` SZEDER Gábor [this message]
2019-11-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] progress: create GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-22 7:15 ` Jeff King
2019-11-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-22 7:17 ` Jeff King
2019-11-25 18:57 ` Derrick Stolee
2019-11-25 21:28 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-25 21:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] progress: create GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-25 21:28 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Jeff King
2019-11-26 15:39 ` Derrick Stolee
2019-11-30 14:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-01 9:33 ` SZEDER Gábor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191121230326.GW23183@szeder.dev \
--to=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ryenus@gmail.com \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).