git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ryenus@gmail.com, stolee@gmail.com,
	szeder.dev@gmail.com, Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress()
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:17:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122071716.GD23225@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e62dcc1ce503311c6c11452862f384492965a35f.1574351516.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:51:56PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:

> The tests that check for the progress output have already been updated
> to use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=0 to force the expected output. However, there
> is one test in t6500-gc.sh that uses the test_terminal method. This
> mechanism does not preserve the GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY environment variable,
> so we need to modify check on the output. We still watch for the
> "Enumerating objects" progress but no longer look for "Computing
> commit graph generation numbers".

I'm still puzzled by this paragraph. If I replace the test hunk in your
patch with this:

diff --git a/t/t6500-gc.sh b/t/t6500-gc.sh
index 7f79eedd1c..0a69a67117 100755
--- a/t/t6500-gc.sh
+++ b/t/t6500-gc.sh
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ test_expect_success 'gc --no-quiet' '
 '
 
 test_expect_success TTY 'with TTY: gc --no-quiet' '
-	test_terminal git -c gc.writeCommitGraph=true gc --no-quiet >stdout 2>stderr &&
+	test_terminal env GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=0 \
+		git -c gc.writeCommitGraph=true gc --no-quiet >stdout 2>stderr &&
 	test_must_be_empty stdout &&
 	test_i18ngrep "Enumerating objects" stderr &&
 	test_i18ngrep "Computing commit graph generation numbers" stderr

the test works fine for me.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-22  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-05 16:05 [PATCH 0/1] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-05 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-05 17:38   ` Derrick Stolee
2019-11-05 20:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-05 20:14   ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-06  4:09     ` Jeff King
2019-11-06 13:21       ` Derrick Stolee
2019-11-07  6:40         ` Jeff King
2019-11-07 13:30           ` Derrick Stolee
2019-11-07  4:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-07  6:43         ` Jeff King
2019-11-07  9:51           ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-07 17:46   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-07 17:46     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] progress: create GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-07 21:22       ` Jeff King
2019-11-11 14:27       ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-11-07 17:46     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-07 21:26       ` Jeff King
2019-11-21 23:03         ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-11-21 15:51     ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-21 15:51       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] progress: create GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-22  7:15         ` Jeff King
2019-11-21 15:51       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-22  7:17         ` Jeff King [this message]
2019-11-25 18:57           ` Derrick Stolee
2019-11-25 21:28       ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-25 21:28         ` [PATCH v5 1/2] progress: create GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-25 21:28         ` [PATCH v5 2/2] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-11-26 12:20         ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Jeff King
2019-11-26 15:39           ` Derrick Stolee
2019-11-30 14:36             ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-01  9:33               ` SZEDER Gábor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191122071716.GD23225@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=ryenus@gmail.com \
    --cc=stolee@gmail.com \
    --cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).