From: Ingo Rohloff <ingo.rohloff@lauterbach.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Rohloff <ingo.rohloff@lauterbach.com>
Subject: [PATCH] branch: Forbid to create local branches with confusing names
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 17:56:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106165628.28563-1-ingo.rohloff@lauterbach.com> (raw)
Without this patch, git allows to do something like this:
git branch remotes/origin/master
git branch refs/remotes/origin/master
git branch heads/master
git branch tags/v3.4
All of these local branch names lead to severe confusion,
not only for a user but also for git itself.
This patch forbids to create local branches, with names which start
with any of
refs/
heads/
remotes/
tags/
With this patch, you might still create these kind of local branches,
but now you have to additionally specify the '-f' option.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Rohloff <ingo.rohloff@lauterbach.com>
---
branch.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
This patch refers way back to the discussion from 2014:
From: Josef Wolf
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: error: src refspec refs/heads/master matches more than one.
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:31:36 +0100
See for example here:
https://public-inbox.org/git/20140214113136.GA17817@raven.inka.de/
The origin of the problem is, that git has (almost) no constraints
what kind of names are allowed for local branches.
There nowadays is a constraint that you are NOT allowed to create
a branch which is called HEAD. See commit 16169285f1e6 ("Merge
branch 'jc/branch-name-sanity'", 2017-11-28).
In the old mail thread a lot of potential constraints for local
branch names were discussed; in particular a lot of strategies
were discussed what kind of local branch names might be a problem
(the gist is: avoid ambiguities, by finding out which names
lead to ambiguities NOW).
I personally think it makes more sense to forbid a much
bigger class of confusing branch names.
In particular I think all local branch names starting with
refs/
heads/
remotes/
tags/
should be forbidden (per default, can still be forced).
This also avoids trouble for an unforseeable future.
Example:
git branch remotes/blub/master
This might not be a problem now, because you have no
remote called "blub" right now.
But if you later use
git remote add blub <URL>
git fetch blub
you very likely run into trouble.
The above approach still allows you to create local branches
with a name of the form
<remote name>/<something ...>
but I cannot see how this might be avoided; remotes might
be added later so what would you do in the case that a local
branch already existed named like the remote or a remote
tracking branch.
With the proposed constraints you are at least are able to use
heads/<remote name>/<something ...>
remotes/<remote name>/<something ...>
to differentiate between the two.
This really is an issue; people seem to stumble over it
and I guess this is particularly true if you control git
via scripts. See for example (two years later):
From: Duy Nguyen
To: Junio C Hamano
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Subject: Re: error: src refspec refs/heads/master matches more than one.
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 18:17:05 +0700
So with this patch I want to pick up this old discussion yet again.
This code can probably be done a lot better I guess, but I wanted to
send in something, to start the discussion.
diff --git a/branch.c b/branch.c
index 579494738a..e74872dac5 100644
--- a/branch.c
+++ b/branch.c
@@ -256,6 +256,16 @@ void create_branch(struct repository *r,
int dont_change_ref = 0;
int explicit_tracking = 0;
+ if (!force && (
+ starts_with(name, "refs/") ||
+ starts_with(name, "heads/") ||
+ starts_with(name, "remotes/") ||
+ starts_with(name, "tags/")
+ )) {
+ die(_("A local branch name should not start with "
+ "\"refs/\", \"heads/\", \"remotes/\" or \"tags/\""));
+ }
+
if (track == BRANCH_TRACK_EXPLICIT || track == BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE)
explicit_tracking = 1;
--
2.24.0.1.g6c2c19214d.dirty
next reply other threads:[~2019-11-06 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-06 16:56 Ingo Rohloff [this message]
2019-11-06 22:15 ` [PATCH] branch: Forbid to create local branches with confusing names Johannes Schindelin
2019-11-07 19:04 ` Ingo Rohloff
2019-11-07 6:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-07 12:54 ` Ingo Rohloff
2019-11-08 2:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-08 12:45 ` Ingo Rohloff
2019-11-07 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Do not create new refnames "refs" or "refs/*" Ingo Rohloff
2019-11-07 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] refs: new function newname_has_bad_prefix Ingo Rohloff
2019-11-07 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] branch: Prevent creation of local branches named "refs" or "refs/*" Ingo Rohloff
2019-11-07 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] remote: Prevent users from creating remotes " Ingo Rohloff
2019-11-07 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tag: Prevent users from creating tags " Ingo Rohloff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191106165628.28563-1-ingo.rohloff@lauterbach.com \
--to=ingo.rohloff@lauterbach.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).