git@vger.kernel.org list mirror (unofficial, one of many)
 help / color / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/1] Fix a bug in ref-filter
@ 2019-04-15 21:04 Damien Robert
  2019-04-15 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) " Damien Robert
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Damien Robert @ 2019-04-15 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git; +Cc: Damien Robert

Dear git developers,

Testing the behaviour of git with respect to pushing and pulling, I noticed
that %(push:track) in git for-each-ref reported the wrong value (ie the
upstream's value rather than the push one).

This patch fixes that.

Please tell me if you would prefer I split this patch in two, one
introducing `stat_push_info` in remote.c and the following one using it in
ref-filter.c


Damien Robert (1):
  Fix %(push:track) in ref-filter

 ref-filter.c            |  7 ++--
 remote.c                | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 remote.h                |  2 ++
 t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh | 12 ++++++-
 4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

-- 
Patched on top of v2.21.0-196-g041f5ea1cf (git version 2.21.0)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) in ref-filter
  2019-04-15 21:04 [PATCH 0/1] Fix a bug in ref-filter Damien Robert
@ 2019-04-15 21:04 ` " Damien Robert
  2019-04-15 22:01   ` Jeff King
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Damien Robert @ 2019-04-15 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git
  Cc: Damien Robert, Junio C Hamano, Jeff King, Karthik Nayak,
	Jeff Hostetler, brian m. carlson

In ref-filter.c, when processing the atom %(push:track), the
ahead/behind values are computed using `stat_tracking_info` which refers
to the upstream branch.

Fix that by introducing a new function `stat_push_info` in remote.c
(exported in remote.h), which does the same thing but for the push
branch. Factorise the ahead/behind computation of `stat_tracking_info` into
`stat_compare_info` so that it can be reused for `stat_push_info`.

This bug was not detected in t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh because in the test
for push:track, both the upstream and the push branch were ahead by 1.
Change the test so that the upstream branch is ahead by 2 while the push
branch is ahead by 1, this allow us to test that %(push:track) refer to
the correct branch.

This change the expected value of some following tests, so update them
too.

Signed-off-by: Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert+git@gmail.com>
---
 ref-filter.c            |  7 ++--
 remote.c                | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 remote.h                |  2 ++
 t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh | 13 ++++++-
 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
index 3aca105307..82e277222b 100644
--- a/ref-filter.c
+++ b/ref-filter.c
@@ -1391,8 +1391,11 @@ static void fill_remote_ref_details(struct used_atom *atom, const char *refname,
 	if (atom->u.remote_ref.option == RR_REF)
 		*s = show_ref(&atom->u.remote_ref.refname, refname);
 	else if (atom->u.remote_ref.option == RR_TRACK) {
-		if (stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
-				       NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) < 0) {
+		if ((atom->u.remote_ref.push ?
+		     stat_push_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
+				    NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) :
+		     stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
+					NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL)) < 0) {
 			*s = xstrdup(msgs.gone);
 		} else if (!num_ours && !num_theirs)
 			*s = xstrdup("");
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index 9cc3b07d21..b2b37d1e8d 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -1880,8 +1880,7 @@ int resolve_remote_symref(struct ref *ref, struct ref *list)
 }
 
 /*
- * Lookup the upstream branch for the given branch and if present, optionally
- * compute the commit ahead/behind values for the pair.
+ * Compute the commit ahead/behind values for the pair branch_name, base.
  *
  * If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL, compute the full ahead/behind and return the
  * counts in *num_ours and *num_theirs.  If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_QUICK, skip
@@ -1891,34 +1890,28 @@ int resolve_remote_symref(struct ref *ref, struct ref *list)
  * The name of the upstream branch (or NULL if no upstream is defined) is
  * returned via *upstream_name, if it is not itself NULL.
  *
- * Returns -1 if num_ours and num_theirs could not be filled in (e.g., no
- * upstream defined, or ref does not exist).  Returns 0 if the commits are
- * identical.  Returns 1 if commits are different.
+ * Returns -1 if num_ours and num_theirs could not be filled in (e.g., ref
+ * does not exist).  Returns 0 if the commits are identical.  Returns 1 if
+ * commits are different.
  */
-int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
-		       const char **upstream_name, enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
+
+int stat_compare_info(const char **branch_name, const char **base,
+		      int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
+		      enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
 {
 	struct object_id oid;
 	struct commit *ours, *theirs;
 	struct rev_info revs;
-	const char *base;
 	struct argv_array argv = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT;
 
-	/* Cannot stat unless we are marked to build on top of somebody else. */
-	base = branch_get_upstream(branch, NULL);
-	if (upstream_name)
-		*upstream_name = base;
-	if (!base)
-		return -1;
-
 	/* Cannot stat if what we used to build on no longer exists */
-	if (read_ref(base, &oid))
+	if (read_ref(*base, &oid))
 		return -1;
 	theirs = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, &oid);
 	if (!theirs)
 		return -1;
 
-	if (read_ref(branch->refname, &oid))
+	if (read_ref(*branch_name, &oid))
 		return -1;
 	ours = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, &oid);
 	if (!ours)
@@ -1932,7 +1925,7 @@ int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
 	if (abf == AHEAD_BEHIND_QUICK)
 		return 1;
 	if (abf != AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL)
-		BUG("stat_tracking_info: invalid abf '%d'", abf);
+		BUG("stat_compare_info: invalid abf '%d'", abf);
 
 	/* Run "rev-list --left-right ours...theirs" internally... */
 	argv_array_push(&argv, ""); /* ignored */
@@ -1966,6 +1959,56 @@ int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
 	return 1;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Lookup the upstream branch for the given branch and if present, optionally
+ * compute the commit ahead/behind values for the pair.
+ *
+ * If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL, compute the full ahead/behind and return the
+ * counts in *num_ours and *num_theirs.  If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_QUICK, skip
+ * the (potentially expensive) a/b computation (*num_ours and *num_theirs are
+ * set to zero).
+ *
+ * The name of the upstream branch (or NULL if no upstream is defined) is
+ * returned via *upstream_name, if it is not itself NULL.
+ *
+ * Returns -1 if num_ours and num_theirs could not be filled in (e.g., no
+ * upstream defined, or ref does not exist).  Returns 0 if the commits are
+ * identical.  Returns 1 if commits are different.
+ */
+int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
+		       const char **upstream_name, enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
+{
+	const char *base;
+
+	/* Cannot stat unless we are marked to build on top of somebody else. */
+	base = branch_get_upstream(branch, NULL);
+	if (upstream_name)
+		*upstream_name = base;
+	if (!base)
+		return -1;
+
+	return stat_compare_info(&(branch->refname), &base, num_ours, num_theirs, abf);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Same as above for the push branch for the given branch and if present,
+ * optionally compute the commit ahead/behind values for the pair.
+ */
+
+int stat_push_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
+		   const char **push_name, enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
+{
+	const char *base;
+
+	base = branch_get_push(branch, NULL);
+	if (push_name)
+		*push_name = base;
+	if (!base)
+		return -1;
+
+	return stat_compare_info(&(branch->refname), &base, num_ours, num_theirs, abf);
+}
+
 /*
  * Return true when there is anything to report, otherwise false.
  */
diff --git a/remote.h b/remote.h
index da53ad570b..0a179f8ded 100644
--- a/remote.h
+++ b/remote.h
@@ -254,6 +254,8 @@ enum ahead_behind_flags {
 /* Reporting of tracking info */
 int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
 		       const char **upstream_name, enum ahead_behind_flags abf);
+int stat_push_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
+		   const char **push_name, enum ahead_behind_flags abf);
 int format_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, struct strbuf *sb,
 			 enum ahead_behind_flags abf);
 
diff --git a/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh b/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
index 0ffd630713..1ec747bd32 100755
--- a/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
+++ b/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
@@ -392,6 +392,14 @@ test_atom head upstream:track '[ahead 1]'
 test_atom head upstream:trackshort '>'
 test_atom head upstream:track,nobracket 'ahead 1'
 test_atom head upstream:nobracket,track 'ahead 1'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup for push:track[short]' '
+	git update-ref refs/remotes/myfork/master master &&
+	test_commit third
+'
+
+test_atom head upstream:track '[ahead 2]'
+test_atom head upstream:trackshort '>'
 test_atom head push:track '[ahead 1]'
 test_atom head push:trackshort '>'
 
@@ -420,8 +428,10 @@ test_expect_success 'Check for invalid refname format' '
 test_expect_success 'set up color tests' '
 	cat >expected.color <<-EOF &&
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/heads/master) <GREEN>master<RESET>
+	$(git rev-parse --short refs/remotes/myfork/master) <GREEN>myfork/master<RESET>
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/remotes/origin/master) <GREEN>origin/master<RESET>
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/tags/testtag) <GREEN>testtag<RESET>
+	$(git rev-parse --short refs/tags/third) <GREEN>third<RESET>
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/tags/two) <GREEN>two<RESET>
 	EOF
 	sed "s/<[^>]*>//g" <expected.color >expected.bare &&
@@ -590,10 +600,11 @@ body contents
 $sig"
 
 cat >expected <<EOF
-$(git rev-parse refs/tags/bogo) <committer@example.com> refs/tags/bogo
 $(git rev-parse refs/tags/master) <committer@example.com> refs/tags/master
+$(git rev-parse refs/tags/bogo) <committer@example.com> refs/tags/bogo
 EOF
 
+
 test_expect_success 'Verify sort with multiple keys' '
 	git for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(taggeremail) %(refname)" --sort=objectname --sort=taggeremail \
 		refs/tags/bogo refs/tags/master > actual &&
-- 
Patched on top of v2.21.0-196-g041f5ea1cf (git version 2.21.0)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) in ref-filter
  2019-04-15 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) " Damien Robert
@ 2019-04-15 22:01   ` Jeff King
  2019-04-16 12:39     ` Damien Robert
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2019-04-15 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Damien Robert
  Cc: git, Damien Robert, Junio C Hamano, Karthik Nayak,
	Jeff Hostetler, brian m. carlson

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:04:16PM +0200, Damien Robert wrote:

> In ref-filter.c, when processing the atom %(push:track), the
> ahead/behind values are computed using `stat_tracking_info` which refers
> to the upstream branch.

Good catch. I think this has been broken since %(push) was added in
29bc88505f (for-each-ref: accept "%(push)" format, 2015-05-21). I don't
actually use the track option, so I never noticed.

> Fix that by introducing a new function `stat_push_info` in remote.c
> (exported in remote.h), which does the same thing but for the push
> branch. Factorise the ahead/behind computation of `stat_tracking_info` into
> `stat_compare_info` so that it can be reused for `stat_push_info`.

Makes sense.

> This bug was not detected in t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh because in the test
> for push:track, both the upstream and the push branch were ahead by 1.
> Change the test so that the upstream branch is ahead by 2 while the push
> branch is ahead by 1, this allow us to test that %(push:track) refer to
> the correct branch.

Nice. I wish all patches were this careful about thinking through
details like this.

> diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
> index 3aca105307..82e277222b 100644
> --- a/ref-filter.c
> +++ b/ref-filter.c
> @@ -1391,8 +1391,11 @@ static void fill_remote_ref_details(struct used_atom *atom, const char *refname,
>  	if (atom->u.remote_ref.option == RR_REF)
>  		*s = show_ref(&atom->u.remote_ref.refname, refname);
>  	else if (atom->u.remote_ref.option == RR_TRACK) {
> -		if (stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
> -				       NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) < 0) {
> +		if ((atom->u.remote_ref.push ?
> +		     stat_push_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
> +				    NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) :
> +		     stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
> +					NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL)) < 0) {
>  			*s = xstrdup(msgs.gone);
>  		} else if (!num_ours && !num_theirs)

I'm a big fan of the "?" operator, but this ternary-within-an-if might
be pushing even my boundaries of taste. :) I wonder if it would be more
readable as:

  int ret;
  if (atom->u.remote_ref.push)
	stat_push_info(...);
  else
	stat_tracking_info(...);
  if (ret < 0)
	... gone ...
  else if (!num_ours && !num_theirs)
	... etc ...

I'd even be OK with a ternary for assigning "ret". :)

All that said, we would need to do the exact same conditional for
":trackshort", wouldn't we? The tests don't pick it up because the
symbol is still ">" for both branches (deja vu!). So it might be worth
not just having push be 2 ahead, but have it actually be behind instead
(or in addition to).

So since we have to do it twice, maybe that makes it worth factoring
out something like:

  int stat_remote_ref(struct used_atom *atom, struct branch *branch,
                      int *num_ours, int *num_theirs)
  {
        if (atom->u.remote_ref.push)
                return stat_push_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
                                      NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL);
        else
                return stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
                                          NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL);
  }

Or perhaps it argues for just giving access to the more generic stat_*
function, and letting callers pass in a flag for push vs upstream (and
either leaving stat_tracking_info() as a wrapper, or just updating its
few callers).

> -int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
> -		       const char **upstream_name, enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
> +
> +int stat_compare_info(const char **branch_name, const char **base,
> +		      int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
> +		      enum ahead_behind_flags abf)

In the original, we need a pointer-to-pointer for upstream_name, because
we return the string as an out-parameter. But here we're just taking two
strings as input. We can drop the extra layer of indirection, like the
patch below.

Also, since this is an internal helper function for the file, we should
mark it as static.

diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index b2b37d1e8d..e6ca62dc19 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -1895,23 +1895,23 @@ int resolve_remote_symref(struct ref *ref, struct ref *list)
  * commits are different.
  */
 
-int stat_compare_info(const char **branch_name, const char **base,
-		      int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
-		      enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
+static int stat_compare_info(const char *branch_name, const char *base,
+			     int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
+			     enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
 {
 	struct object_id oid;
 	struct commit *ours, *theirs;
 	struct rev_info revs;
 	struct argv_array argv = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT;
 
 	/* Cannot stat if what we used to build on no longer exists */
-	if (read_ref(*base, &oid))
+	if (read_ref(base, &oid))
 		return -1;
 	theirs = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, &oid);
 	if (!theirs)
 		return -1;
 
-	if (read_ref(*branch_name, &oid))
+	if (read_ref(branch_name, &oid))
 		return -1;
 	ours = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, &oid);
 	if (!ours)
@@ -1987,7 +1987,7 @@ int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
 	if (!base)
 		return -1;
 
-	return stat_compare_info(&(branch->refname), &base, num_ours, num_theirs, abf);
+	return stat_compare_info(branch->refname, base, num_ours, num_theirs, abf);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2006,7 +2006,7 @@ int stat_push_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
 	if (!base)
 		return -1;
 
-	return stat_compare_info(&(branch->refname), &base, num_ours, num_theirs, abf);
+	return stat_compare_info(branch->refname, base, num_ours, num_theirs, abf);
 }
 
 /*

Of course if you buy my argument above that we should just let
ref-filter call into the generic form of the function, then all of that
would change. :)

> [...]

Other than that, the patch looked quite reasonable. I didn't dig too far
into the ripple effects of the test changes, since I think we'll end up
changing them again to make sure ":trackshort" is distinct.

Thanks for working on this.

-Peff

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) in ref-filter
  2019-04-15 22:01   ` Jeff King
@ 2019-04-16 12:39     ` Damien Robert
  2019-04-16 14:13       ` Christian Couder
  2019-04-16 21:48       ` Jeff King
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Damien Robert @ 2019-04-16 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff King
  Cc: git, Junio C Hamano, Karthik Nayak, Jeff Hostetler, brian m. carlson

From Jeff King, Mon 15 Apr 2019 at 18:01:08 (-0400) :
> > +		if ((atom->u.remote_ref.push ?
> > +		     stat_push_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
> > +				    NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) :
> > +		     stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
> > +					NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL)) < 0) {

> I'm a big fan of the "?" operator, but this ternary-within-an-if might
> be pushing even my boundaries of taste. :)

I knew I was pushing the limit of readability a bit here :)

> All that said, we would need to do the exact same conditional for
> ":trackshort", wouldn't we?

Crap, you are right, I wanted to handle this case too but forgot :-(

> The tests don't pick it up because the
> symbol is still ">" for both branches (deja vu!). So it might be worth
> not just having push be 2 ahead, but have it actually be behind instead
> (or in addition to).

Done in the new version.

> Or perhaps it argues for just giving access to the more generic stat_*
> function, and letting callers pass in a flag for push vs upstream (and
> either leaving stat_tracking_info() as a wrapper, or just updating its
> few callers).

So I went ahead with modifying `stat_tracking_info` to accept a 'for_push'
flag, and updated the few callers. This means that `stat_compare_info` is
only used by `stat_tracking_info` so I could reinline it, but I guess it
could still be useful latter.

> 
> > -int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
> > -		       const char **upstream_name, enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
> > +
> > +int stat_compare_info(const char **branch_name, const char **base,
> > +		      int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
> > +		      enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
> 
> In the original, we need a pointer-to-pointer for upstream_name, because
> we return the string as an out-parameter. But here we're just taking two
> strings as input. We can drop the extra layer of indirection, like the
> patch below.

Good catch, done.

> Also, since this is an internal helper function for the file, we should
> mark it as static.

Yes. In fact in the first version of the patch I would call
`stat_compare_info` directly in `ref_filter.c` so I needed to export it in
`remote.h`, and then when I changed the patch I forgot to make it static.

> Other than that, the patch looked quite reasonable. I didn't dig too far
> into the ripple effects of the test changes, since I think we'll end up
> changing them again to make sure ":trackshort" is distinct.

There are now less impactful than before because the master branch in the
test refers to the same commit as before; there is just a new commit for the
'myfork' remote branch.

> Thanks for working on this.

You are welcome. What's the standard way to acknowledge your help in
the Foo-By: trailers? I did not put a Reviewed-By: because you reviewed the
previous patch, not the current one :)

-- 
Damien Robert
http://www.normalesup.org/~robert/pro

---- >8 -----
From: Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert+git@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:16:46 +0200
Subject: [v2 PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) in ref-filter

In ref-filter.c, when processing the atom %(push:track), the
ahead/behind values are computed using `stat_tracking_info` which refers
to the upstream branch.

Fix that by introducing a new flag `for_push` in `stat_tracking_info`
in remote.c, which does the same thing but for the push branch.
Update the few callers of `stat_tracking_info` to handle this flag. This
ensure that whenever we use this function in the future, we are careful
to specify is this should apply to the upstream or the push branch.

This bug was not detected in t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh because in the test
for push:track, both the upstream and the push branches were behind by 1
from the local branch. Change the test so that the upstream branch is
behind by 1 while the push branch is ahead by 1. This allows us to test
that %(push:track) refer to the correct branch.

This change the expected value of some following tests (by introducing
new references), so update them too.

Signed-off-by: Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert+git@gmail.com>
---
 ref-filter.c            |  6 ++--
 remote.c                | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 remote.h                |  3 +-
 t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh | 14 +++++++--
 wt-status.c             |  4 +--
 5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
index 3aca105307..31af81fb28 100644
--- a/ref-filter.c
+++ b/ref-filter.c
@@ -1392,7 +1392,8 @@ static void fill_remote_ref_details(struct used_atom *atom, const char *refname,
 		*s = show_ref(&atom->u.remote_ref.refname, refname);
 	else if (atom->u.remote_ref.option == RR_TRACK) {
 		if (stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
-				       NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) < 0) {
+				       NULL, atom->u.remote_ref.push,
+				       AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) < 0) {
 			*s = xstrdup(msgs.gone);
 		} else if (!num_ours && !num_theirs)
 			*s = xstrdup("");
@@ -1410,7 +1411,8 @@ static void fill_remote_ref_details(struct used_atom *atom, const char *refname,
 		}
 	} else if (atom->u.remote_ref.option == RR_TRACKSHORT) {
 		if (stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
-				       NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) < 0) {
+				       NULL, atom->u.remote_ref.push,
+				       AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) < 0) {
 			*s = xstrdup("");
 			return;
 		}
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index 9cc3b07d21..e98c6f2a0a 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -1880,37 +1880,27 @@ int resolve_remote_symref(struct ref *ref, struct ref *list)
 }
 
 /*
- * Lookup the upstream branch for the given branch and if present, optionally
- * compute the commit ahead/behind values for the pair.
+ * Compute the commit ahead/behind values for the pair branch_name, base.
  *
  * If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL, compute the full ahead/behind and return the
  * counts in *num_ours and *num_theirs.  If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_QUICK, skip
  * the (potentially expensive) a/b computation (*num_ours and *num_theirs are
  * set to zero).
  *
- * The name of the upstream branch (or NULL if no upstream is defined) is
- * returned via *upstream_name, if it is not itself NULL.
- *
- * Returns -1 if num_ours and num_theirs could not be filled in (e.g., no
- * upstream defined, or ref does not exist).  Returns 0 if the commits are
- * identical.  Returns 1 if commits are different.
+ * Returns -1 if num_ours and num_theirs could not be filled in (e.g., ref
+ * does not exist).  Returns 0 if the commits are identical.  Returns 1 if
+ * commits are different.
  */
-int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
-		       const char **upstream_name, enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
+
+static int stat_compare_info(const char *branch_name, const char *base,
+			     int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
+			     enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
 {
 	struct object_id oid;
 	struct commit *ours, *theirs;
 	struct rev_info revs;
-	const char *base;
 	struct argv_array argv = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT;
 
-	/* Cannot stat unless we are marked to build on top of somebody else. */
-	base = branch_get_upstream(branch, NULL);
-	if (upstream_name)
-		*upstream_name = base;
-	if (!base)
-		return -1;
-
 	/* Cannot stat if what we used to build on no longer exists */
 	if (read_ref(base, &oid))
 		return -1;
@@ -1918,7 +1908,7 @@ int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
 	if (!theirs)
 		return -1;
 
-	if (read_ref(branch->refname, &oid))
+	if (read_ref(branch_name, &oid))
 		return -1;
 	ours = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, &oid);
 	if (!ours)
@@ -1932,7 +1922,7 @@ int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
 	if (abf == AHEAD_BEHIND_QUICK)
 		return 1;
 	if (abf != AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL)
-		BUG("stat_tracking_info: invalid abf '%d'", abf);
+		BUG("stat_compare_info: invalid abf '%d'", abf);
 
 	/* Run "rev-list --left-right ours...theirs" internally... */
 	argv_array_push(&argv, ""); /* ignored */
@@ -1966,6 +1956,42 @@ int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
 	return 1;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Lookup the upstream branch for the given branch and if present, optionally
+ * compute the commit ahead/behind values for the pair.
+ *
+ * If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL, compute the full ahead/behind and return the
+ * counts in *num_ours and *num_theirs.  If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_QUICK, skip
+ * the (potentially expensive) a/b computation (*num_ours and *num_theirs are
+ * set to zero).
+ *
+ * The name of the upstream branch (or NULL if no upstream is defined) is
+ * returned via *upstream_name, if it is not itself NULL.
+ *
+ * If for_push is true, then return the stats and name of the push branch
+ * rather than the upstream branch.
+ *
+ * Returns -1 if num_ours and num_theirs could not be filled in (e.g., no
+ * upstream defined, or ref does not exist).  Returns 0 if the commits are
+ * identical.  Returns 1 if commits are different.
+ */
+int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
+		       const char **upstream_name, int for_push,
+		       enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
+{
+	const char *base;
+
+	/* Cannot stat unless we are marked to build on top of somebody else. */
+	base = for_push ? branch_get_push(branch, NULL) :
+		branch_get_upstream(branch, NULL);
+	if (upstream_name)
+		*upstream_name = base;
+	if (!base)
+		return -1;
+
+	return stat_compare_info(branch->refname, base, num_ours, num_theirs, abf);
+}
+
 /*
  * Return true when there is anything to report, otherwise false.
  */
@@ -1977,7 +2003,7 @@ int format_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, struct strbuf *sb,
 	char *base;
 	int upstream_is_gone = 0;
 
-	sti = stat_tracking_info(branch, &ours, &theirs, &full_base, abf);
+	sti = stat_tracking_info(branch, &ours, &theirs, &full_base, 0, abf);
 	if (sti < 0) {
 		if (!full_base)
 			return 0;
diff --git a/remote.h b/remote.h
index da53ad570b..0138b3fb98 100644
--- a/remote.h
+++ b/remote.h
@@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ enum ahead_behind_flags {
 
 /* Reporting of tracking info */
 int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
-		       const char **upstream_name, enum ahead_behind_flags abf);
+		       const char **upstream_name, int for_push,
+		       enum ahead_behind_flags abf);
 int format_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, struct strbuf *sb,
 			 enum ahead_behind_flags abf);
 
diff --git a/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh b/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
index 0ffd630713..836c985744 100755
--- a/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
+++ b/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
@@ -392,8 +392,15 @@ test_atom head upstream:track '[ahead 1]'
 test_atom head upstream:trackshort '>'
 test_atom head upstream:track,nobracket 'ahead 1'
 test_atom head upstream:nobracket,track 'ahead 1'
-test_atom head push:track '[ahead 1]'
-test_atom head push:trackshort '>'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup for push:track[short]' '
+	test_commit third &&
+	git update-ref refs/remotes/myfork/master master &&
+	git reset master~1
+'
+
+test_atom head push:track '[behind 1]'
+test_atom head push:trackshort '<'
 
 test_expect_success 'Check that :track[short] cannot be used with other atoms' '
 	test_must_fail git for-each-ref --format="%(refname:track)" 2>/dev/null &&
@@ -420,8 +427,10 @@ test_expect_success 'Check for invalid refname format' '
 test_expect_success 'set up color tests' '
 	cat >expected.color <<-EOF &&
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/heads/master) <GREEN>master<RESET>
+	$(git rev-parse --short refs/remotes/myfork/master) <GREEN>myfork/master<RESET>
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/remotes/origin/master) <GREEN>origin/master<RESET>
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/tags/testtag) <GREEN>testtag<RESET>
+	$(git rev-parse --short refs/tags/third) <GREEN>third<RESET>
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/tags/two) <GREEN>two<RESET>
 	EOF
 	sed "s/<[^>]*>//g" <expected.color >expected.bare &&
@@ -594,6 +603,7 @@ $(git rev-parse refs/tags/bogo) <committer@example.com> refs/tags/bogo
 $(git rev-parse refs/tags/master) <committer@example.com> refs/tags/master
 EOF
 
+
 test_expect_success 'Verify sort with multiple keys' '
 	git for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(taggeremail) %(refname)" --sort=objectname --sort=taggeremail \
 		refs/tags/bogo refs/tags/master > actual &&
diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index 445a36204a..5a7ec2cf99 100644
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -1851,7 +1851,7 @@ static void wt_shortstatus_print_tracking(struct wt_status *s)
 	color_fprintf(s->fp, branch_color_local, "%s", branch_name);
 
 	sti = stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs, &base,
-				 s->ahead_behind_flags);
+				 0, s->ahead_behind_flags);
 	if (sti < 0) {
 		if (!base)
 			goto conclude;
@@ -1990,7 +1990,7 @@ static void wt_porcelain_v2_print_tracking(struct wt_status *s)
 		branch = branch_get(branch_name);
 		base = NULL;
 		ab_info = stat_tracking_info(branch, &nr_ahead, &nr_behind,
-					     &base, s->ahead_behind_flags);
+					     &base, 0, s->ahead_behind_flags);
 		if (base) {
 			base = shorten_unambiguous_ref(base, 0);
 			fprintf(s->fp, "# branch.upstream %s%c", base, eol);
-- 
Patched on top of v2.21.0-313-ge35b8cb8e2 (git version 2.21.0)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) in ref-filter
  2019-04-16 12:39     ` Damien Robert
@ 2019-04-16 14:13       ` Christian Couder
  2019-04-16 21:48       ` Jeff King
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christian Couder @ 2019-04-16 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Damien Robert
  Cc: Jeff King, git, Junio C Hamano, Karthik Nayak, Jeff Hostetler,
	brian m. carlson

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 2:42 PM Damien Robert
<damien.olivier.robert@gmail.com> wrote:

> You are welcome. What's the standard way to acknowledge your help in
> the Foo-By: trailers? I did not put a Reviewed-By: because you reviewed the
> previous patch, not the current one :)

We often use:

Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) in ref-filter
  2019-04-16 12:39     ` Damien Robert
  2019-04-16 14:13       ` Christian Couder
@ 2019-04-16 21:48       ` Jeff King
  2019-04-17  8:17         ` Damien Robert
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2019-04-16 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Damien Robert
  Cc: git, Junio C Hamano, Karthik Nayak, Jeff Hostetler, brian m. carlson

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:39:45PM +0200, Damien Robert wrote:

> > Or perhaps it argues for just giving access to the more generic stat_*
> > function, and letting callers pass in a flag for push vs upstream (and
> > either leaving stat_tracking_info() as a wrapper, or just updating its
> > few callers).
> 
> So I went ahead with modifying `stat_tracking_info` to accept a 'for_push'
> flag, and updated the few callers. This means that `stat_compare_info` is
> only used by `stat_tracking_info` so I could reinline it, but I guess it
> could still be useful latter.

Reading this paragraph, my gut reaction was to say that it should stay
as a single function. But actually looking at the code, I think it is a
bit nicer to separate out "compare these two branches" from "figure out
which branches to compare".

The name "compare_info" is a bit vague. Perhaps "stat_branch_pair" or
something would be more descriptive.

> > Also, since this is an internal helper function for the file, we should
> > mark it as static.
> 
> Yes. In fact in the first version of the patch I would call
> `stat_compare_info` directly in `ref_filter.c` so I needed to export it in
> `remote.h`, and then when I changed the patch I forgot to make it static.

Heh. I wondered if that might have been the reason.

> > Thanks for working on this.
> 
> You are welcome. What's the standard way to acknowledge your help in
> the Foo-By: trailers? I did not put a Reviewed-By: because you reviewed the
> previous patch, not the current one :)

Right, Reviewed-by wouldn't be quite right. As Christian noted,
Helped-by can be used for this (but I am also fine without credit;
suggestions are a normal part of review).

Overall the patch looks good to me. I have a few extremely minor nits:

> Subject: [v2 PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) in ref-filter

We'd usually say "area: do something" here, and it's nice to stay
consistent so that reading --oneline output is easy. And it's nice if we
can avoid vague terms like "fix". Maybe:

 ref-filter: use correct branch for %(push:track)

or something?

> This bug was not detected in t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh because in the test
> for push:track, both the upstream and the push branches were behind by 1
> from the local branch. Change the test so that the upstream branch is
> behind by 1 while the push branch is ahead by 1. This allows us to test
> that %(push:track) refer to the correct branch.

s/refer/&s/

> This change the expected value of some following tests (by introducing
> new references), so update them too.

s/change/&s/

>  	if (abf != AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL)
> -		BUG("stat_tracking_info: invalid abf '%d'", abf);
> +		BUG("stat_compare_info: invalid abf '%d'", abf);

If we do the name change I mentioned above, don't forger this line. :)

> +int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
> +		       const char **upstream_name, int for_push,
> +		       enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
> +{

Is it worth changing "upstream_name" since it sometimes is now not
%(upstream)?

> @@ -1977,7 +2003,7 @@ int format_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, struct strbuf *sb,
>  	char *base;
>  	int upstream_is_gone = 0;
>  
> -	sti = stat_tracking_info(branch, &ours, &theirs, &full_base, abf);
> +	sti = stat_tracking_info(branch, &ours, &theirs, &full_base, 0, abf);

I was tempted to suggest doing this refactor as a separate patch, so
that we'd see less noise in the diff. But in fact half of the callers
we'd have to touch are ones that would be modified to use for_push
anyway. So I think it makes sense to just keep it all together as a
single unit.

> diff --git a/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh b/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
> [...]
> @@ -594,6 +603,7 @@ $(git rev-parse refs/tags/bogo) <committer@example.com> refs/tags/bogo
>  $(git rev-parse refs/tags/master) <committer@example.com> refs/tags/master
>  EOF
>  
> +
>  test_expect_success 'Verify sort with multiple keys' '
>  	git for-each-ref --format="%(objectname) %(taggeremail) %(refname)" --sort=objectname --sort=taggeremail \
>  		refs/tags/bogo refs/tags/master > actual &&

Leftover stray whitespace?

For any one of those nits I'd probably say it was not worth a re-roll
(and the maintainer could adjust them when he picks up the patch).  But
there are just enough that it's probably worth making his life easier
with a v3.

You can put my Reviewed-by on it, too. :)

-Peff

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) in ref-filter
  2019-04-16 21:48       ` Jeff King
@ 2019-04-17  8:17         ` Damien Robert
  2019-04-18  0:23           ` Junio C Hamano
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Damien Robert @ 2019-04-17  8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff King
  Cc: git, Junio C Hamano, Karthik Nayak, Jeff Hostetler, brian m. carlson

From Jeff King, Tue 16 Apr 2019 at 17:48:43 (-0400) :
> The name "compare_info" is a bit vague. Perhaps "stat_branch_pair" or
> something would be more descriptive.

Done.
 
>  ref-filter: use correct branch for %(push:track)

Done.

> s/refer/&s/
> s/change/&s/

Grmf, thanks.

> Is it worth changing "upstream_name" since it sometimes is now not
> %(upstream)?

Changed to tracking_name.

> Leftover stray whitespace?

Oups.
 
> For any one of those nits I'd probably say it was not worth a re-roll
> (and the maintainer could adjust them when he picks up the patch).  But
> there are just enough that it's probably worth making his life easier
> with a v3.
> You can put my Reviewed-by on it, too. :)

Here it is:

---- >8 ----
From: Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert+git@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:16:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCHv3 1/1] ref-filter: use correct branch for %(push:track)

In ref-filter.c, when processing the atom %(push:track), the
ahead/behind values are computed using `stat_tracking_info` which refers
to the upstream branch.

Fix that by introducing a new flag `for_push` in `stat_tracking_info`
in remote.c, which does the same thing but for the push branch.
Update the few callers of `stat_tracking_info` to handle this flag. This
ensure that whenever we use this function in the future, we are careful
to specify is this should apply to the upstream or the push branch.

This bug was not detected in t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh because in the test
for push:track, both the upstream and the push branches were behind by 1
from the local branch. Change the test so that the upstream branch is
behind by 1 while the push branch is ahead by 1. This allows us to test
that %(push:track) refers to the correct branch.

This changes the expected value of some following tests (by introducing
new references), so update them too.

Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert+git@gmail.com>
---
 ref-filter.c            |  6 ++--
 remote.c                | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 remote.h                |  3 +-
 t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh | 13 ++++++--
 wt-status.c             |  4 +--
 5 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
index 3aca105307..31af81fb28 100644
--- a/ref-filter.c
+++ b/ref-filter.c
@@ -1392,7 +1392,8 @@ static void fill_remote_ref_details(struct used_atom *atom, const char *refname,
 		*s = show_ref(&atom->u.remote_ref.refname, refname);
 	else if (atom->u.remote_ref.option == RR_TRACK) {
 		if (stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
-				       NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) < 0) {
+				       NULL, atom->u.remote_ref.push,
+				       AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) < 0) {
 			*s = xstrdup(msgs.gone);
 		} else if (!num_ours && !num_theirs)
 			*s = xstrdup("");
@@ -1410,7 +1411,8 @@ static void fill_remote_ref_details(struct used_atom *atom, const char *refname,
 		}
 	} else if (atom->u.remote_ref.option == RR_TRACKSHORT) {
 		if (stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs,
-				       NULL, AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) < 0) {
+				       NULL, atom->u.remote_ref.push,
+				       AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL) < 0) {
 			*s = xstrdup("");
 			return;
 		}
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index 9cc3b07d21..0761d1ab21 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -1880,37 +1880,27 @@ int resolve_remote_symref(struct ref *ref, struct ref *list)
 }
 
 /*
- * Lookup the upstream branch for the given branch and if present, optionally
- * compute the commit ahead/behind values for the pair.
+ * Compute the commit ahead/behind values for the pair branch_name, base.
  *
  * If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL, compute the full ahead/behind and return the
  * counts in *num_ours and *num_theirs.  If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_QUICK, skip
  * the (potentially expensive) a/b computation (*num_ours and *num_theirs are
  * set to zero).
  *
- * The name of the upstream branch (or NULL if no upstream is defined) is
- * returned via *upstream_name, if it is not itself NULL.
- *
- * Returns -1 if num_ours and num_theirs could not be filled in (e.g., no
- * upstream defined, or ref does not exist).  Returns 0 if the commits are
- * identical.  Returns 1 if commits are different.
+ * Returns -1 if num_ours and num_theirs could not be filled in (e.g., ref
+ * does not exist).  Returns 0 if the commits are identical.  Returns 1 if
+ * commits are different.
  */
-int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
-		       const char **upstream_name, enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
+
+static int stat_branch_pair(const char *branch_name, const char *base,
+			     int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
+			     enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
 {
 	struct object_id oid;
 	struct commit *ours, *theirs;
 	struct rev_info revs;
-	const char *base;
 	struct argv_array argv = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT;
 
-	/* Cannot stat unless we are marked to build on top of somebody else. */
-	base = branch_get_upstream(branch, NULL);
-	if (upstream_name)
-		*upstream_name = base;
-	if (!base)
-		return -1;
-
 	/* Cannot stat if what we used to build on no longer exists */
 	if (read_ref(base, &oid))
 		return -1;
@@ -1918,7 +1908,7 @@ int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
 	if (!theirs)
 		return -1;
 
-	if (read_ref(branch->refname, &oid))
+	if (read_ref(branch_name, &oid))
 		return -1;
 	ours = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, &oid);
 	if (!ours)
@@ -1932,7 +1922,7 @@ int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
 	if (abf == AHEAD_BEHIND_QUICK)
 		return 1;
 	if (abf != AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL)
-		BUG("stat_tracking_info: invalid abf '%d'", abf);
+		BUG("stat_branch_pair: invalid abf '%d'", abf);
 
 	/* Run "rev-list --left-right ours...theirs" internally... */
 	argv_array_push(&argv, ""); /* ignored */
@@ -1966,6 +1956,42 @@ int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
 	return 1;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Lookup the tracking branch for the given branch and if present, optionally
+ * compute the commit ahead/behind values for the pair.
+ *
+ * If for_push is true, the tracking branch refers to the push branch,
+ * otherwise it refers to the upstream branch.
+ *
+ * The name of the tracking branch (or NULL if it is not defined) is
+ * returned via *tracking_name, if it is not itself NULL.
+ *
+ * If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_FULL, compute the full ahead/behind and return the
+ * counts in *num_ours and *num_theirs.  If abf is AHEAD_BEHIND_QUICK, skip
+ * the (potentially expensive) a/b computation (*num_ours and *num_theirs are
+ * set to zero).
+ *
+ * Returns -1 if num_ours and num_theirs could not be filled in (e.g., no
+ * upstream defined, or ref does not exist).  Returns 0 if the commits are
+ * identical.  Returns 1 if commits are different.
+ */
+int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
+		       const char **tracking_name, int for_push,
+		       enum ahead_behind_flags abf)
+{
+	const char *base;
+
+	/* Cannot stat unless we are marked to build on top of somebody else. */
+	base = for_push ? branch_get_push(branch, NULL) :
+		branch_get_upstream(branch, NULL);
+	if (tracking_name)
+		*tracking_name = base;
+	if (!base)
+		return -1;
+
+	return stat_branch_pair(branch->refname, base, num_ours, num_theirs, abf);
+}
+
 /*
  * Return true when there is anything to report, otherwise false.
  */
@@ -1977,7 +2003,7 @@ int format_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, struct strbuf *sb,
 	char *base;
 	int upstream_is_gone = 0;
 
-	sti = stat_tracking_info(branch, &ours, &theirs, &full_base, abf);
+	sti = stat_tracking_info(branch, &ours, &theirs, &full_base, 0, abf);
 	if (sti < 0) {
 		if (!full_base)
 			return 0;
diff --git a/remote.h b/remote.h
index da53ad570b..0138b3fb98 100644
--- a/remote.h
+++ b/remote.h
@@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ enum ahead_behind_flags {
 
 /* Reporting of tracking info */
 int stat_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, int *num_ours, int *num_theirs,
-		       const char **upstream_name, enum ahead_behind_flags abf);
+		       const char **upstream_name, int for_push,
+		       enum ahead_behind_flags abf);
 int format_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, struct strbuf *sb,
 			 enum ahead_behind_flags abf);
 
diff --git a/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh b/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
index 0ffd630713..d9235217fc 100755
--- a/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
+++ b/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
@@ -392,8 +392,15 @@ test_atom head upstream:track '[ahead 1]'
 test_atom head upstream:trackshort '>'
 test_atom head upstream:track,nobracket 'ahead 1'
 test_atom head upstream:nobracket,track 'ahead 1'
-test_atom head push:track '[ahead 1]'
-test_atom head push:trackshort '>'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup for push:track[short]' '
+	test_commit third &&
+	git update-ref refs/remotes/myfork/master master &&
+	git reset master~1
+'
+
+test_atom head push:track '[behind 1]'
+test_atom head push:trackshort '<'
 
 test_expect_success 'Check that :track[short] cannot be used with other atoms' '
 	test_must_fail git for-each-ref --format="%(refname:track)" 2>/dev/null &&
@@ -420,8 +427,10 @@ test_expect_success 'Check for invalid refname format' '
 test_expect_success 'set up color tests' '
 	cat >expected.color <<-EOF &&
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/heads/master) <GREEN>master<RESET>
+	$(git rev-parse --short refs/remotes/myfork/master) <GREEN>myfork/master<RESET>
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/remotes/origin/master) <GREEN>origin/master<RESET>
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/tags/testtag) <GREEN>testtag<RESET>
+	$(git rev-parse --short refs/tags/third) <GREEN>third<RESET>
 	$(git rev-parse --short refs/tags/two) <GREEN>two<RESET>
 	EOF
 	sed "s/<[^>]*>//g" <expected.color >expected.bare &&
diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index 445a36204a..5a7ec2cf99 100644
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -1851,7 +1851,7 @@ static void wt_shortstatus_print_tracking(struct wt_status *s)
 	color_fprintf(s->fp, branch_color_local, "%s", branch_name);
 
 	sti = stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs, &base,
-				 s->ahead_behind_flags);
+				 0, s->ahead_behind_flags);
 	if (sti < 0) {
 		if (!base)
 			goto conclude;
@@ -1990,7 +1990,7 @@ static void wt_porcelain_v2_print_tracking(struct wt_status *s)
 		branch = branch_get(branch_name);
 		base = NULL;
 		ab_info = stat_tracking_info(branch, &nr_ahead, &nr_behind,
-					     &base, s->ahead_behind_flags);
+					     &base, 0, s->ahead_behind_flags);
 		if (base) {
 			base = shorten_unambiguous_ref(base, 0);
 			fprintf(s->fp, "# branch.upstream %s%c", base, eol);
-- 
Patched on top of v2.21.0-313-ge35b8cb8e2 (git version 2.21.0)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) in ref-filter
  2019-04-17  8:17         ` Damien Robert
@ 2019-04-18  0:23           ` Junio C Hamano
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2019-04-18  0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Damien Robert
  Cc: Jeff King, git, Karthik Nayak, Jeff Hostetler, brian m. carlson

Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert+git@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:16:46 +0200
> Subject: [PATCHv3 1/1] ref-filter: use correct branch for %(push:track)
>
> In ref-filter.c, when processing the atom %(push:track), the
> ahead/behind values are computed using `stat_tracking_info` which refers
> to the upstream branch.
> ...

Thanks, both.  Will queue.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-04-15 21:04 [PATCH 0/1] Fix a bug in ref-filter Damien Robert
2019-04-15 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] Fix %(push:track) " Damien Robert
2019-04-15 22:01   ` Jeff King
2019-04-16 12:39     ` Damien Robert
2019-04-16 14:13       ` Christian Couder
2019-04-16 21:48       ` Jeff King
2019-04-17  8:17         ` Damien Robert
2019-04-18  0:23           ` Junio C Hamano

git@vger.kernel.org list mirror (unofficial, one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/git
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:
	nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git

 note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/
       or Tor2web: https://www.tor2web.org/

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox