git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
	"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
	"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] completion.commands does not remove multiple commands
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 17:15:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190301221551.GD31362@zaya.teonanacatl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190301183017.GB30847@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> 
>> Jeff King wrote:
>>> I can reproduce your problem, though the test you included passes for me
>>> even with the current tip of master.
>> 
>> Oh, hrm.  I think the issue is that completion.commands needs to be
>> set in the global (or system-wide) config, via test_config_global
>> rather than the local repo config which test_config sets.
>> 
>> In hindsight, that seems obvious.  But it's probably worth noting
>> that where completion.commands is documented, for anyone who might
>> spend a few cycles trying to configure it on a per-repo basis before
>> realizing it doesn't work.
> 
> I think this is actually a bug. Normally code that is checking config
> before we've decide to do setup_git_directory() would use
> read_early_config(), which uses discover_git_directory() to tentatively
> see if we're in a repo, and if so to add it to the config sequence.
> 
> But this code uses the caching configset mechanism. And that code
> (rightly) does not use read_early_config(), because it has no idea if
> it's being called early or what.
> 
> I think we probably ought to be doing something like this:
> 
> diff --git a/git.c b/git.c
> index 2dd588674f..ba3690245e 100644
> --- a/git.c
> +++ b/git.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,13 @@ static int list_cmds(const char *spec)
>  {
>  	struct string_list list = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
>  	int i;
> +	int nongit;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Set up the repository so we can pick up any repo-level config (like
> +	 * completion.commands).
> +	 */
> +	setup_git_directory_gently(&nongit);
>  
>  	while (*spec) {
>  		const char *sep = strchrnul(spec, ',');

Hmm.  The comments in list_cmds_by_config() made me wonder
if not using a local repo config was intentional:

        /*
         * There's no actual repository setup at this point (and even
         * if there is, we don't really care; only global config
         * matters). If we accidentally set up a repository, it's ok
         * too since the caller (git --list-cmds=) should exit shortly
         * anyway.
         */

Is the cost of setting up a repository something which might
noticeably slow down interactive completion?  In my testing
today I haven't felt it, but I have loads of memory on this
system.

I did apply your change and that allows the test to use
test_config() rather than test_config_global().  The full
test suite passes, so the change doesn't trigger any new
issues we have covered by a test, at least.

If we wanted to respect local configs, how does this look?

-- 8< --
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: [PATCH] git: read local config in --list-cmds

Normally code that is checking config before we've decide to do
setup_git_directory() would use read_early_config(), which uses
discover_git_directory() to tentatively see if we're in a repo,
and if so to add it to the config sequence.

But list_cmds() uses the caching configset mechanism and
(rightly) does not use read_early_config(), because it has no
idea if it's being called early.

Call setup_git_directory_gently() so we can pick up repo-level
config (like completion.commands).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
 git.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/git.c b/git.c
index 2dd588674f..10e49d79f6 100644
--- a/git.c
+++ b/git.c
@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@ static int list_cmds(const char *spec)
 {
 	struct string_list list = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
 	int i;
+	int nongit;
+
+	/*
+	* Set up the repository so we can pick up any repo-level config (like
+	* completion.commands).
+	*/
+	setup_git_directory_gently(&nongit);
 
 	while (*spec) {
 		const char *sep = strchrnul(spec, ',');
-- 8< --

-- 
Todd

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-01 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-28 22:31 [BUG] completion.commands does not remove multiple commands Todd Zullinger
2019-02-28 23:05 ` Jeff King
2019-03-01 17:34   ` Todd Zullinger
2019-03-01 18:30     ` Jeff King
2019-03-01 22:15       ` Todd Zullinger [this message]
2019-03-01 23:08         ` Jeff King
2019-03-02  1:08           ` Duy Nguyen
2019-03-02  1:18         ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-02  2:40           ` Todd Zullinger
2019-03-02  4:07             ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-03-03  1:34               ` Todd Zullinger
2019-03-03 17:06               ` Jeff King
2019-03-01 17:34   ` [PATCH 1/3] doc: note config file restrictions for completion.commands Todd Zullinger
2019-03-17 13:12     ` Duy Nguyen
2019-03-17 18:16       ` [PATCH v2 0/4] completion.commands: fix multiple command removals Todd Zullinger
2019-03-17 18:16       ` [PATCH v2 1/4] git: read local config in --list-cmds Todd Zullinger
2019-03-18  9:41         ` Duy Nguyen
2019-03-20 18:03           ` [PATCH v3 0/4] completion.commands: fix multiple command removals Todd Zullinger
2019-03-21  2:58             ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-21 17:18               ` Todd Zullinger
2019-03-21  9:45             ` Duy Nguyen
2019-03-20 18:03           ` [PATCH v3 1/4] git: read local config in --list-cmds Todd Zullinger
2019-03-20 18:03           ` [PATCH v3 2/4] t9902: test multiple removals via completion.commands Todd Zullinger
2019-03-20 18:03           ` [PATCH v3 3/4] completion: fix multiple command removals Todd Zullinger
2019-03-20 18:03           ` [PATCH v3 4/4] completion: use __git when calling --list-cmds Todd Zullinger
2019-03-17 18:16       ` [PATCH v2 2/4] t9902: test multiple removals via completion.commands Todd Zullinger
2019-03-17 18:16       ` [PATCH v2 3/4] completion: fix multiple command removals Todd Zullinger
2019-03-17 18:16       ` [PATCH v2 4/4] completion: use __git when calling --list-cmds Todd Zullinger
2019-03-01 17:34   ` [PATCH 2/3] t9902: test multiple removals via completion.commands Todd Zullinger
2019-03-01 18:22     ` Eric Sunshine
2019-03-01 20:50       ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-03-01 21:56         ` Todd Zullinger
2019-03-01 17:34   ` [PATCH 3/3] completion: fix multiple command removals Todd Zullinger
2019-03-01 18:16     ` Jeff King
2019-02-28 23:05 ` [BUG] completion.commands does not remove multiple commands SZEDER Gábor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190301221551.GD31362@zaya.teonanacatl.net \
    --to=tmz@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    --cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).