From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mingw: handle absolute paths in expand_user_path()
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:18:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181108011813.GA10148@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqlg649zs8.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 09:30:15AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 10:36:52PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> >
> > All that said, if we're just interested in allowing this for config,
> > then we already have such a wrapper function: git_config_pathname().
> >
> > So I don't think it's a big deal to implement it in any of these ways.
> > It's much more important to get the syntax right, because that's
> > user-facing and will be with us forever.
>
> All of us are on the same page after seeing the clarification by
> Dscho, it seems. I came to pretty much the same conclusion this
> morning before reading this subthread. Outside config values, the
> callers of expand_user_path() only feed "~/.git$constant", and they
> are all about "personal customization" that do not want to be shared
> with other users of the same installation, so "relative to runtime
> prefix" feature would not be wanted. But we do not know about new
> caller's needs. For now I am OK to have it in expand_user_path(),
> possibly renaming the function if people feel it is needed (I don't).
I think we would want to carefully think about the call in enter_repo().
We do not want git-daemon to accidentally expose repositories in
$RUNTIME_PREFIX.
Looking over the code, I think this is OK. The expansion happens in
enter_repo(), and then we take the path that was found and do our
ok_paths checks on it (which makes sense -- even now you'd ask to export
"/home/" and it would need to look at "~peff/repo.git" and expand that
to "/home/peff/repo.git" before doing a simple string check.
> Between ~<reserved name> and $VARIABLE_LOOKING_THINGS, I do not have
> a strong preference either way, but I am getting an impression that
> the latter is more generally favoured in the discussion?
I certainly prefer the latter, but I thought I was the only one to have
expressed support so far. ;)
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-08 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-06 14:53 [PATCH 0/1] mingw: handle absolute paths in expand_user_path() Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-11-06 14:53 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-11-06 15:54 ` Ramsay Jones
2018-11-06 16:10 ` Ramsay Jones
2018-11-06 18:27 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-11-07 1:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-11-07 11:19 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-07 17:42 ` Ramsay Jones
2018-11-08 0:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-11-08 13:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-08 14:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-11-08 15:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-09 2:05 ` Joseph Moisan
2018-11-09 10:21 ` Jeff King
2018-11-06 18:24 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-11-07 11:19 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-06 21:32 ` Johannes Sixt
2018-11-07 11:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-07 18:52 ` Johannes Sixt
2018-11-07 20:41 ` Jeff King
2018-11-07 21:36 ` Johannes Sixt
2018-11-07 22:03 ` Jeff King
2018-11-08 0:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-11-08 1:18 ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-11-08 3:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-11-08 13:11 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-08 14:25 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-11-08 15:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-08 17:40 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-11-09 10:19 ` Jeff King
2018-11-09 16:16 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-11-12 3:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-11-08 14:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-11-08 15:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-07-01 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-07-01 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tests: exercise the RUNTIME_PREFIX feature Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-07-01 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] expand_user_path(): support specifying paths relative to the runtime prefix Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-07-01 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mingw: handle absolute paths in expand_user_path() Junio C Hamano
2021-07-24 22:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-07-24 22:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] tests: exercise the RUNTIME_PREFIX feature Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-07-24 22:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] expand_user_path(): remove stale part of the comment Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-07-24 22:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] expand_user_path(): clarify the role of the `real_home` parameter Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-07-24 22:06 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] Use a better name for the function interpolating paths Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-07-26 22:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-27 7:57 ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-07-27 22:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-28 0:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-28 0:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-28 5:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-28 8:18 ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-07-28 17:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-24 22:06 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] interpolate_path(): allow specifying paths relative to the runtime prefix Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-07-26 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] mingw: handle absolute paths in expand_user_path() Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181108011813.GA10148@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).