git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, sunshine@sunshineco.com, peff@peff.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] builtin/config.c: support `--type=<type>` as preferred alias for `--type`
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:33:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180411013309.GA36066@syl.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtvsizg9u.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:24:45AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>
> > Attached is the eighth re-roll of my series to add `--type=<type>` as
> > the preferred alternative for `--<type>`.
> >
> > The main changes since v7 concern handling degenerate cases, such as:
> >
> >   * git config --type=int --type=bool
> >   * git config --type=int --int
> >
> > We have previously had discussion about whether we should (1) retain the
> > error in previous versions when confronted with multiple, conflicting
> > type specifiers, (2) ignore the error, in favor of making --<type> and
> > --type=<type> true synonyms, or (3) some combination of the two.
> >
> > I have thought some more about my argument that it would be favorable to
> > make "--type=int" and "--int" behave in the same way, and I am no
> > longer convinced that my argument makes sense. It's based on the premise
> > that "--type=<type>" must _necessarily_ allow multiple invocations, such
> > as '--type=int --type=bool', and therefore "--int --bool" should be
> > updated to behave the same way.
> >
> > We are not constrained to this behavior, so in v8, I have taught Git the
> > following:
> >
> >   1. Allow multiple non-conflicting types, such as '--int --int',
> >      '--type=int --int', and '--int --type=int'.
> >
> >   2. Disallow multiple conflicting types, such as '--int --bool',
> >      '--type=int --bool', and '--int --type=bool'.
> >
> >   3. Allow conflicting types following --no-type, such as '--int
> >      --no-type --bool', '--type=int --no-type --bool', and '--int
> >      --no-type --type=bool'. Note that this does _not_ introduce options
> >      such as '--no-int' and whatnot.
> >
> > This is accomplished by a new locally defined macro called
> > OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE, which allows us to reuse option_parse_type() to
> > handle --int as well, by sending it through as opt->defval.
> >
> > I think that the above is the best-of-all-worlds choice, but I am
> > curious to hear everyone else's thoughts. Thanks in advance for your
> > review.
>
> I too am curious.  Personally I do not think your "last one wins"
> was necessarily bad--in fact it internally was consistent--I just
> thought that the log message did not justify the choice well.  And I
> do not think the semantics defined by this one, "once you choose,
> stick to it, or explicitly clear the previous choice", is bad,
> either.

:-). If nothing else, I like that we retain more, stricter behavior from
previous versions.

> > diff --git a/builtin/config.c b/builtin/config.c
> > index 5c8952a17c..7184c09582 100644
> > --- a/builtin/config.c
> > +++ b/builtin/config.c
> > @@ -61,28 +61,53 @@ static int show_origin;
> >  #define TYPE_PATH		4
> >  #define TYPE_EXPIRY_DATE	5
> >
> > +#define OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(s, l, h, f, i) \
> > +	{ OPTION_CALLBACK, (s), (l), NULL, NULL, (h), PARSE_OPT_NOARG | \
> > +	PARSE_OPT_NONEG, (f), (i) }
> > +
> > +static struct option builtin_config_options[];
>
> OK.  I am not sure if OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE() needs to take 'f', as you
> always pass the option_parse_type function to it.

That's fair. I left this in as an indication that something like this
_might_ want to make its way into parse-options.h as a general-purpose
utility, but was not yet ready to do so. Thus, I defined it inside
builtin/config.c.

> >  static int option_parse_type(const struct option *opt, const char *arg,
> >  			     int unset)
> >  {
> > -	int *type = opt->value;
> > -
> >  	if (unset) {
> > -		*type = 0;
> > +		type = 0;
> >  		return 0;
> >  	}
> >
> > -	if (!strcmp(arg, "bool"))
> > -		*type = TYPE_BOOL;
> > -	else if (!strcmp(arg, "int"))
> > -		*type = TYPE_INT;
> > -	else if (!strcmp(arg, "bool-or-int"))
> > -		*type = TYPE_BOOL_OR_INT;
> > -	else if (!strcmp(arg, "path"))
> > -		*type = TYPE_PATH;
> > -	else if (!strcmp(arg, "expiry-date"))
> > -		*type = TYPE_EXPIRY_DATE;
> > -	else
> > -		die(_("unrecognized --type argument, %s"), arg);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * To support '--<type>' style flags, begin with new_type equal to
> > +	 * opt->defval.
> > +	 */
> > +	int new_type = opt->defval;
> > +	if (!new_type) {
> > +		if (!strcmp(arg, "bool"))
> > +			new_type = TYPE_BOOL;
> > +		else if (!strcmp(arg, "int"))
> > +			new_type = TYPE_INT;
> > +		else if (!strcmp(arg, "bool-or-int"))
> > +			new_type = TYPE_BOOL_OR_INT;
> > +		else if (!strcmp(arg, "path"))
> > +			new_type = TYPE_PATH;
> > +		else if (!strcmp(arg, "expiry-date"))
> > +			new_type = TYPE_EXPIRY_DATE;
> > +		else
> > +			die(_("unrecognized --type argument, %s"), arg);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (type != 0 && type != new_type) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Complain when there is a new type not equal to the old type.
> > +		 * This allows for combinations like '--int --type=int' and
> > +		 * '--type=int --type=int', but disallows ones like '--type=bool
> > +		 * --int' and '--type=bool
> > +		 * --type=int'.
> > +		 */
> > +		error("only one type at a time.");
> > +		usage_with_options(builtin_config_usage,
> > +			builtin_config_options);
> > +	}
> > +	type = new_type;
>
> Does this rely on a file-scope global variable (type)?

I don't think it does. I think I had conflated the difference between
opt->value and opt->defval while amending this patch. What do you think of the
following (which removes reaching outside the function for "type")?

diff --git a/builtin/config.c b/builtin/config.c
index 7184c09582..53755ca461 100644
--- a/builtin/config.c
+++ b/builtin/config.c
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ static int show_origin;
 #define TYPE_PATH		4
 #define TYPE_EXPIRY_DATE	5

-#define OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(s, l, h, f, i) \
-	{ OPTION_CALLBACK, (s), (l), NULL, NULL, (h), PARSE_OPT_NOARG | \
+#define OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(s, l, v, h, f, i) \
+	{ OPTION_CALLBACK, (s), (l), (v), NULL, (h), PARSE_OPT_NOARG | \
 	PARSE_OPT_NONEG, (f), (i) }

 static struct option builtin_config_options[];
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int option_parse_type(const struct option *opt, const char *arg,
 			     int unset)
 {
 	if (unset) {
-		type = 0;
+		*((int *) opt->value) = 0;
 		return 0;
 	}

@@ -95,7 +95,8 @@ static int option_parse_type(const struct option *opt, const char *arg,
 			die(_("unrecognized --type argument, %s"), arg);
 	}

-	if (type != 0 && type != new_type) {
+	int *to_type = opt->value;
+	if (*to_type && *to_type != new_type) {
 		/*
 		 * Complain when there is a new type not equal to the old type.
 		 * This allows for combinations like '--int --type=int' and
@@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ static int option_parse_type(const struct option *opt, const char *arg,
 		usage_with_options(builtin_config_usage,
 			builtin_config_options);
 	}
-	type = new_type;
+	*to_type = new_type;

 	return 0;
 }
@@ -135,12 +136,12 @@ static struct option builtin_config_options[] = {
 	OPT_BIT(0, "get-color", &actions, N_("find the color configured: slot [default]"), ACTION_GET_COLOR),
 	OPT_BIT(0, "get-colorbool", &actions, N_("find the color setting: slot [stdout-is-tty]"), ACTION_GET_COLORBOOL),
 	OPT_GROUP(N_("Type")),
-	OPT_CALLBACK('t', "type", NULL, "", N_("value is given this type"), option_parse_type),
-	OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(0, "bool", N_("value is \"true\" or \"false\""), option_parse_type, TYPE_BOOL),
-	OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(0, "int", N_("value is decimal number"), option_parse_type, TYPE_INT),
-	OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(0, "bool-or-int", N_("value is --bool or --int"), option_parse_type, TYPE_BOOL_OR_INT),
-	OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(0, "path", N_("value is a path (file or directory name)"), option_parse_type, TYPE_PATH),
-	OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(0, "expiry-date", N_("value is an expiry date"), option_parse_type, TYPE_EXPIRY_DATE),
+	OPT_CALLBACK('t', "type", &type, "", N_("value is given this type"), option_parse_type),
+	OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(0, "bool", &type, N_("value is \"true\" or \"false\""), option_parse_type, TYPE_BOOL),
+	OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(0, "int", &type, N_("value is decimal number"), option_parse_type, TYPE_INT),
+	OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(0, "bool-or-int", &type, N_("value is --bool or --int"), option_parse_type, TYPE_BOOL_OR_INT),
+	OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(0, "path", &type, N_("value is a path (file or directory name)"), option_parse_type, TYPE_PATH),
+	OPT_CALLBACK_VALUE(0, "expiry-date", &type, N_("value is an expiry date"), option_parse_type, TYPE_EXPIRY_DATE),
 	OPT_GROUP(N_("Other")),
 	OPT_BOOL('z', "null", &end_null, N_("terminate values with NUL byte")),
 	OPT_BOOL(0, "name-only", &omit_values, N_("show variable names only")),


Thanks,
Taylor

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-11  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-28 23:47 [PATCH] builtin/config.c: prefer `--type=bool` over `--bool`, etc Taylor Blau
2018-03-29 20:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-29 22:11 ` Jeff King
2018-03-30  5:27   ` Taylor Blau
2018-03-30 13:53     ` Jeff King
2018-03-30 16:00       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-30 18:27         ` Jeff King
2018-03-30  5:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] builtin/config.c: treat type specifiers singularly Taylor Blau
2018-03-30  5:28   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] builtin/config.c: prefer `--type=bool` over `--bool`, etc Taylor Blau
2018-03-30  6:17     ` René Scharfe
2018-03-30 13:48     ` Jeff King
2018-03-30 13:41   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] builtin/config.c: treat type specifiers singularly Jeff King
2018-04-04  6:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] builtin/config.c: prefer `--type=bool` over `--bool`, etc Taylor Blau
2018-04-04  6:07   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] builtin/config.c: treat type specifiers singularly Taylor Blau
2018-04-04  7:57     ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-05  1:53       ` Taylor Blau
2018-04-05 21:51         ` Jeff King
2018-04-04  6:07   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] builtin/config.c: prefer `--type=bool` over `--bool`, etc Taylor Blau
2018-04-04  7:27     ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-05  1:47       ` Taylor Blau
2018-04-05  2:00 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Taylor Blau
2018-04-05 21:58   ` Jeff King
2018-04-05 22:15     ` Taylor Blau
     [not found] ` <cover.1522893363.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
2018-04-05  2:00   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] builtin/config.c: treat type specifiers singularly Taylor Blau
2018-04-05  2:00   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] builtin/config.c: prefer `--type=bool` over `--bool`, etc Taylor Blau
2018-04-05 22:29     ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-05 22:40       ` Jeff King
2018-04-06  5:19         ` Taylor Blau
2018-04-06  5:17       ` Taylor Blau
2018-04-05  2:02   ` Taylor Blau
2018-04-05 22:12     ` Jeff King
2018-04-05 22:15       ` Taylor Blau
2018-04-06  5:08       ` Taylor Blau
2018-04-06  6:38 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] builtin/config.c: support `--type=<type>` as preferred alias for `--type` Taylor Blau
     [not found] ` <cover.1522996619.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
2018-04-06  6:39   ` [PATCH v6 1/2] builtin/config.c: treat type specifiers singularly Taylor Blau
2018-04-06  6:39   ` [PATCH v6 2/2] builtin/config.c: support `--type=<type>` as preferred alias for `--type` Taylor Blau
2018-04-06  7:04     ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-07  0:39       ` Taylor Blau
2018-04-07  8:25         ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-09 22:46 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] " Taylor Blau
2018-04-09 23:11   ` Eric Sunshine
     [not found] ` <cover.1523313730.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
2018-04-09 22:46   ` [PATCH v7 1/2] builtin/config.c: treat type specifiers singularly Taylor Blau
2018-04-10  1:22     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-10  2:12       ` Taylor Blau
2018-04-10  4:13         ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-09 22:46   ` [PATCH v7 2/2] builtin/config.c: support `--type=<type>` as preferred alias for `--type` Taylor Blau
2018-04-10  1:44     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-10  2:17       ` Taylor Blau
2018-04-11  1:06 ` [PATCH v8 0/2] " Taylor Blau
2018-04-11  1:24   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-11  1:33     ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2018-04-11  3:11       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-11  3:49         ` Taylor Blau
     [not found] ` <cover.1523408336.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
2018-04-11  1:06   ` [PATCH v8 1/2] builtin/config.c: treat type specifiers singularly Taylor Blau
2018-04-11  1:07   ` [PATCH v8 2/2] builtin/config.c: support `--type=<type>` as preferred alias for `--type` Taylor Blau
2018-04-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v9 0/2] " Taylor Blau
     [not found] ` <cover.1524087557.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
2018-04-18 21:43   ` [PATCH v9 1/2] builtin/config.c: treat type specifiers singularly Taylor Blau
2018-04-18 21:43   ` [PATCH v9 2/2] builtin/config.c: support `--type=<type>` as preferred alias for `--type` Taylor Blau
2018-04-19  2:47     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-19  3:01       ` Taylor Blau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180411013309.GA36066@syl.local \
    --to=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).