git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fmt-merge-msg: avoid leaking strbuf in shortlog()
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:17:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171208211706.GB7355@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1654a696-73d5-c9ef-0fc2-bd82aaf2cabb@web.de>

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 06:29:34PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote:

> > By the way, I think there's another quite subtle leak in this function.
> > We do this:
> > 
> >    format_commit_message(commit, "%s", &sb, &ctx);
> >    strbuf_ltrim(&sb);
> > 
> > and then only use "sb" if sb.len is non-zero. But we may have actually
> > allocated to create our zero-length string (e.g., if we had a strbuf
> > full of spaces and trimmed them all off). Since we reuse "sb" over and
> > over as we loop, this will actually only leak once for the whole loop,
> > not once per iteration. So it's probably not a big deal, but writing it
> > with the explicit reset/release pattern fixes that (and is more
> > idiomatic for our code base, I think).
> 
> It's subtle, but I think it's not leaking, at least not in your example
> case (and I can't think of another way).  IIUC format_subject(), which
> handles the "%s" part, doesn't touch sb if the subject is made up only
> of whitespace.

Yeah, I suspected that may be the case. But IMHO it is a poor use of
strbufs if you have to dig that far to see whether the code leaks or
not. The whole point of strbufs is to make string handling and memory
ownership more obviously correct.

Just skimming the history, I think it's mostly an artifact of the
function was slowly converted over the years.

-Peff

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-08 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-07 20:22 [PATCH] fmt-merge-msg: avoid leaking strbuf in shortlog() René Scharfe
2017-12-07 21:27 ` Jeff King
2017-12-08 17:29   ` René Scharfe
2017-12-08 18:44     ` Junio C Hamano
2017-12-08 20:10       ` René Scharfe
2017-12-08 21:11     ` Jeff King
2017-12-07 21:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-12-08 10:14   ` Jeff King
2017-12-08 17:29     ` René Scharfe
2017-12-08 18:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2017-12-08 21:28         ` Jeff King
2017-12-18 19:18           ` René Scharfe
2017-12-19 11:38             ` Jeff King
2017-12-19 18:26               ` René Scharfe
2017-12-20 13:05                 ` Jeff King
2017-12-08 21:17       ` Jeff King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171208211706.GB7355@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=l.s.r@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).