From: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] progress: fix progress meters when dealing with lots of work
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:28:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171113122834.20a69d1e87defe95d6e0e8ed@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171113201600.24878-3-newren@gmail.com>
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:15:58 -0800
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
> The possibility of setting merge.renameLimit beyond 2^16 raises the
> possibility that the values passed to progress can exceed 2^32.
> Use uint64_t, because it "ought to be enough for anybody". :-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> ---
> This does imply 64-bit math for all progress operations. Possible alternatives
> I could think of listed at
> https://public-inbox.org/git/CABPp-BH1Cpc9UfYpmBBAHWSqadg=QuD=28qx1oV29ZdvF4NbJw@mail.gmail.com/
> Opinions of others on whether 64-bit is okay, or preference for which alternative
> is picked?
I haven't looked into this in much detail, but another alternative to
consider is to use size_t everywhere. This also allows us to use st_add
and st_mult, which checks overflow for us.
Changing progress to use the size_t of the local machine makes sense to
me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-13 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-13 20:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix issues with rename detection limits Elijah Newren
2017-11-13 20:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sequencer: warn when internal merge may be suboptimal due to renameLimit Elijah Newren
2017-11-13 20:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] progress: fix progress meters when dealing with lots of work Elijah Newren
2017-11-13 20:28 ` Jonathan Tan [this message]
2017-11-13 21:33 ` Jonathan Tan
2017-11-13 22:26 ` Elijah Newren
2017-11-13 20:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Remove silent clamp of renameLimit Elijah Newren
2017-11-13 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sequencer: show rename progress during cherry picks Elijah Newren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171113122834.20a69d1e87defe95d6e0e8ed@google.com \
--to=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).