From: Leandro Lucarella <leandro.lucarella@sociomantic.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Mehul Jain <mehul.jain2029@gmail.com>, <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.10.0: git log --oneline prints gpg signatures in 4 lines
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:24:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160921122454.2a736dea@labs-064.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160920231533.fxcdjgphz25hnbxt@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 19:15:33 -0400
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:09:54PM +0200, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
>
> > Hi, starting from 2.10.0 I noticed that when using git log
> > --oneline, if commits are signed with GPG, now the signatures are
> > printed too, and it takes 3 lines for the signature information + 1
> > line for the title of the commit, so suddenly --oneline became
> > --fourline :)
> >
> > Is this really intended?
>
> I don't think anything has changed here in 2.10. Running "git log
> --oneline --show-signature" has _always_ been horribly ugly. However,
> 2.10 did introduce the "log.showsignature" config, which makes "git
> log --oneline" pretty unusable when it is enabled. Ditto for
> one-liner uses of "--format".
Right! Now I remember, I changed my configuration when I read the
release notes, before I upgraded. Now that I did upgrade I'm seeing the
results.
Anyway, yeah, using the new configuration makes --oneline pretty
unusable, so ignoring that option for --oneline seems like a good idea.
> I think we should probably ignore the config entirely when using any
> of the one-liner formats (and I'd include --format, too, even though
> it can sometimes be multi-line; it already has %GG to include that
> information as appropriate).
>
> Another option would be to somehow represent the signature information
> in the --oneline output, but I think I'd rather leave that for people
> to experiment with using "--format".
I think it might be nice to show the information in one line in a ver
succinct way, like just showing a green unicode check mark (✓) or a red
cross mark (❌) if it failed (or just colour the commit subject in
green/red if a signature is present and is passing/failing).
Thanks!
--
Leandro Lucarella
Technical Development Lead
Sociomantic Labs GmbH <http://www.sociomantic.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-21 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-20 15:09 2.10.0: git log --oneline prints gpg signatures in 4 lines Leandro Lucarella
2016-09-20 23:15 ` Jeff King
2016-09-21 10:24 ` Leandro Lucarella [this message]
2016-09-21 13:53 ` Leandro Lucarella
2016-09-21 15:05 ` Michael J Gruber
2016-09-21 16:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-21 16:19 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160921122454.2a736dea@labs-064.localdomain \
--to=leandro.lucarella@sociomantic.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mehul.jain2029@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).