git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
To: Leo Gaspard <leo@gaspard.io>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Migrating away from SHA-1?
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:17:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160624181705.GA7035@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02b42587-3643-1c2e-c249-313ec96bcdca@gaspard.io>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2250 bytes --]

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:10:27AM +0100, Leo Gaspard wrote:
> First, sorry for not having this message threaded: I'm not subscribed to
> the list and haven't found a way to get a Message-Id from gmane.

Sorry it's taken so long to get back to this.  I've been at a
conference.

> So, my questions to the git team:
>  * Is there a consensus, that git should migrate away from SHA-1 before
> it gets a collision attack, because it would mean chosen-prefix
> collision isn't far away and people wouldn't have the time to upgrade?

I plan on adding support for a new hash as soon as that's possible, but
I don't have a firm timeline.  This is a volunteer effort in my own
limited free time.

>  * Is there a consensus, that Peter Anvin's amended transition plan is
> the way to go?

I'm not planning on changing algorithms in the middle of a repository.
This will only be available on new or imported repositories.

My current thinking on proposed algorithms is SHA3-256 or BLAKE2b-256.
The cryptanalysis on SHA-256 indicates that it may not be a great
long-term choice, and I expect people won't want to change algorithms
frequently.

If time becomes extremely urgent, we can always add support for a
160-bit hash first (e.g. BLAKE2b-160) and then finish the object_id
transition later as it becomes convenient.  I'd like to avoid that,
though.

>  * If the two conditions above are fulfilled, has work started on it
> yet? (I guess as Brian Carlson had started his work 9 weeks ago and he
> was speaking about working on it on the week-end he should have finished
> it now, so excluding this)

It takes a long time to get a patch series through.  I'm rather busy and
don't always have time to rebase and address issues during the week.

>  * If the two first conditions are fulfilled, is there anything I could
> do to help this transition? (including helping Brian if his work hasn't
> actually ended yet)

You're welcome to send patches if you like.  I try to avoid areas I know
are under heavy development, like the refs code.
-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-24 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-18  2:10 Migrating away from SHA-1? Leo Gaspard
2016-06-18  3:30 ` Eric Wong
2016-06-24 18:17 ` brian m. carlson [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-12 22:38 H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-12 23:00 ` Stefan Beller
2016-04-12 23:06   ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-12 23:15   ` Jeff King
2016-04-12 23:15   ` David Turner
2016-04-12 23:44     ` Jeff King
2016-04-14  1:53     ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-04-14 16:47       ` Joey Hess
2016-04-14 17:23       ` David Turner
2016-04-14 17:28         ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-14 22:40           ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-04-15  2:13             ` Jeff King
2016-04-15  2:18               ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-15  2:22                 ` Jeff King
2016-04-12 23:42 ` Jeff King
2016-04-13  1:03   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-13  1:36     ` Jeff King
2016-04-13  1:38     ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-13  1:51 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-04-13  1:58   ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-15  1:50     ` brian m. carlson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160624181705.GA7035@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net \
    --to=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leo@gaspard.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).