From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Doug Kelly <dougk.ff7@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] prepare_packed_git(): refactor garbage reporting in pack directory
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:23:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160113202329.GA7678@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEtYS8RA2HONEARQ03EiT8Ch+F2am+YJuRz2hNiSGO25N8Lf4g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:19:05PM -0600, Doug Kelly wrote:
> However, back to the point: should the wait value be hard coded? Configurable
> as a new option? What should our default wait be?
I'd think it would make sense to match the expiration time we feed to
prune. That's overly conservative, but I think that's OK (and the user
can tweak it down).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-21 18:41 Question: .idx without .pack causes performance issues? Doug Kelly
2015-07-21 18:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-07-21 19:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-07-21 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-07-21 21:37 ` Doug Kelly
2015-08-03 22:17 ` Doug Kelly
2015-08-04 1:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-07 21:36 ` Doug Kelly
2015-08-07 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] prepare_packed_git(): refactor garbage reporting in pack directory Doug Kelly
2015-08-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] gc: Remove garbage .idx files from pack dir Doug Kelly
2015-08-17 16:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-17 20:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-13 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] prepare_packed_git(): refactor garbage reporting in pack directory Eric Sunshine
2015-08-17 16:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-10-28 17:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-10-28 22:43 ` Doug Kelly
2015-11-04 3:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Doug Kelly
2015-11-04 3:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] t5304: Add test for cleaning pack garbage Doug Kelly
2015-11-04 3:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] gc: Remove garbage .idx files from pack dir Doug Kelly
2015-11-04 3:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] prepare_packed_git(): refactor garbage reporting in pack directory Doug Kelly
2015-11-04 19:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-11-04 19:56 ` Doug Kelly
2015-11-04 20:02 ` Jeff King
2015-11-04 20:08 ` Doug Kelly
2015-11-04 20:15 ` Jeff King
2015-12-30 7:37 ` Jeff King
2016-01-13 17:14 ` Doug Kelly
2016-01-13 20:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-13 20:19 ` Doug Kelly
2016-01-13 20:23 ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-11-04 19:56 ` Jeff King
[not found] ` <CABYiQpn7r2Vcf=S5RaWHBN85eBYGPV_e02+BY=4L98qfUzDT1Q@mail.gmail.com>
2015-11-11 14:58 ` Fwd: Question: .idx without .pack causes performance issues? Thomas Berg
2015-07-21 19:49 ` Doug Kelly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160113202329.GA7678@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=dougk.ff7@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).