From: Yann Dirson <dirson@bertin.fr>
To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, git list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2010, #01; Sat, 4)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:48:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101206094806.10ae1ff2@chalon.bertin.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimPC3-x1XFJ+t9uiFFXV6fg812ugF5vz9p=4GWB@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:39:54 +0900
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Yann Dirson <dirson@bertin.fr> wrote:
> > Seen that argument before.
> > 1. does anyone care ? (I personally don't)
>
> If nobody cared, you wouldn't get an argument.
OK, I can hear that - but well, noone complained till now that
--find-copies-harder would sound like "an action to be performed
_instead_ of some normal processing".
But most importantly, I don't get much feedback on the direct
implication of that choice: are we going to have 2 exact synonyms
(--find-copies-harder and --detect-copies-harder) forever, and to what
extent (see prev. mail about completion) ?
In the end, I still think the implications for the usability are what
matters, more than arguing about a subtle nuance of vocabulary.
--
Yann Dirson - Bertin Technologies
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-06 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-05 6:30 What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2010, #01; Sat, 4) Junio C Hamano
2010-12-05 7:39 ` Jeff King
2010-12-05 19:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-12-06 0:54 ` aleksi.aalto
2010-12-09 17:27 ` Jeff King
2010-12-10 19:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-12-05 10:13 ` Yann Dirson
2010-12-05 20:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-12-06 7:29 ` Yann Dirson
2010-12-06 8:13 ` Miles Bader
2010-12-06 8:21 ` Yann Dirson
2010-12-06 8:39 ` Miles Bader
2010-12-06 8:48 ` Yann Dirson [this message]
2010-12-06 9:13 ` Miles Bader
2010-12-06 11:31 ` Yann Dirson
2010-12-06 11:37 ` Matthieu Moy
2010-12-10 21:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-12-05 12:36 ` aleksi.aalto
2010-12-05 15:51 ` Patrick Rouleau
2010-12-05 13:00 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-12-05 20:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-12-05 15:00 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-12-05 20:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-12-06 8:55 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-12-06 15:39 ` Thiago Farina
2010-12-08 11:23 ` t9010 broken in pu [Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2010, #01; Sat, 4)] Thomas Rast
2010-12-08 11:28 ` Jonathan Nieder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101206094806.10ae1ff2@chalon.bertin.fr \
--to=dirson@bertin.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).