From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>,
bug-gnulib@gnu.org,
Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] posix: User scratch_buffer on fnmatch
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 21:35:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2h8h23r.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210104202528.1228255-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> (Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha's message of "Mon, 4 Jan 2021 17:25:27 -0300")
* Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha:
> It removes the alloca usage on the string convertion to wide characters
> before calling the internal function.
We have a downstream-only patch to fall back the single byte handling in
case of multibyte decoding failure. Basically it's a quick hack to fix
this bug:
<https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14185>
Is this something we should upstream? Or rework fnmatch so that * is
matched properly against arbitrary bytes?
Thanks,
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-04 20:25 [PATCH 1/2] posix: User scratch_buffer on fnmatch Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-04 20:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] posix: Remove alloca usage for internal fnmatch implementation Adhemerval Zanella
2021-03-08 12:59 ` Florian Weimer
2021-10-20 15:12 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-10-21 9:54 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-04 20:35 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2021-01-05 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] posix: User scratch_buffer on fnmatch Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-13 19:25 ` Paul Eggert
2021-01-13 19:39 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-13 23:36 ` Bruno Haible
2021-01-14 10:00 ` Florian Weimer
2021-03-06 17:18 ` Paul Eggert
2021-03-06 20:17 ` dealing with non-ASCII-safe encodings Bruno Haible
2021-01-14 11:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] posix: User scratch_buffer on fnmatch Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-15 6:56 ` Paul Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y2h8h23r.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=bug-gnulib@gnu.org \
--cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).