bug-gnulib@gnu.org mirror (unofficial)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
To: Kamil Dudka <kdudka@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>, bug-gnulib@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Coverity false positives triggered by gnulib's implementation of base64
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 16:11:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2726075.gEfPVFXcrz@omega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3321511.HH5c3TB8kT@kdudka-nb>

Kamil Dudka wrote:
> Thanks!  This also helps to suppress the false positives on cryptsetup
> with Coverity Static Analysis version 2019.03.

Good! Since this is the approach that Paul prefers, I'm pushing this one:


2019-05-10  Bruno Haible  <bruno@clisp.org>

	base64: Avoid false positive warning from Coverity.
	Reported by Kamil Dudka <kdudka@redhat.com>.
	Idea by Paul Eggert.
	* lib/base64.c (base64_encode_fast, base64_encode): Add a no-op
	'& 0x3f' to the array index expressions. This convinces Coverity that
	there is no out-of-bounds array reference, regardless of the input.

diff --git a/lib/base64.c b/lib/base64.c
index f3f7298..a00e0f4 100644
--- a/lib/base64.c
+++ b/lib/base64.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ base64_encode_fast (const char *restrict in, size_t inlen, char *restrict out)
 {
   while (inlen)
     {
-      *out++ = b64c[to_uchar (in[0]) >> 2];
+      *out++ = b64c[(to_uchar (in[0]) >> 2) & 0x3f];
       *out++ = b64c[((to_uchar (in[0]) << 4) + (to_uchar (in[1]) >> 4)) & 0x3f];
       *out++ = b64c[((to_uchar (in[1]) << 2) + (to_uchar (in[2]) >> 6)) & 0x3f];
       *out++ = b64c[to_uchar (in[2]) & 0x3f];
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ base64_encode (const char *restrict in, size_t inlen,
 
   while (inlen && outlen)
     {
-      *out++ = b64c[to_uchar (in[0]) >> 2];
+      *out++ = b64c[(to_uchar (in[0]) >> 2) & 0x3f];
       if (!--outlen)
         break;
       *out++ = b64c[((to_uchar (in[0]) << 4)



  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-10 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-07 14:22 Coverity false positives triggered by gnulib's implementation of base64 Kamil Dudka
2019-05-08  8:15 ` Bruno Haible
2019-05-09 16:14   ` Kamil Dudka
2019-05-09 20:35     ` Bruno Haible
2019-05-09 21:55       ` Paul Eggert
2019-05-09 22:13         ` Bruno Haible
2019-05-09 22:28           ` Paul Eggert
2019-05-10 11:57           ` Kamil Dudka
2019-05-10 14:11             ` Bruno Haible [this message]
2019-05-10 14:32               ` Kamil Dudka
2019-05-10 11:41       ` Kamil Dudka
2019-05-09 19:14 ` Paul Eggert
2019-05-10 11:32   ` Kamil Dudka
2019-05-10 11:34     ` Florian Weimer
2019-05-10 11:51       ` Kamil Dudka
2019-05-10 23:36     ` Paul Eggert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2726075.gEfPVFXcrz@omega \
    --to=bruno@clisp.org \
    --cc=bug-gnulib@gnu.org \
    --cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=kdudka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).