Re: [PATCH] doc: fill in omitted word

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Kristoffer Haugsbakk <kristoffer.haugsbakk@gmail.com> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <kristoffer.haugsbakk@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/gitcore-tutorial.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/gitcore-tutorial.txt b/Documentation/gitcore-tutorial.txt
> index 4546fa0..9860517 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gitcore-tutorial.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/gitcore-tutorial.txt
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ you want to understand Git's internals.
>  The core Git is often called "plumbing", with the prettier user
>  interfaces on top of it called "porcelain". You may not want to use the
>  plumbing directly very often, but it can be good to know what the
> -plumbing does for when the porcelain isn't flushing.
> +plumbing does for you when the porcelain isn't flushing.

I need an English teacher here to help me out, but I think this
changes the meaning of the sentence from what the original author
intended..

The way I've read this statement for the past ten years since it was
written originally at 8c7fa2478e ("Add first cut at a simple git
tutorial.", 2005-05-31) and then slightly reworded at f35ca9ed3e
("tutorial.txt: start describing how to copy repositories",
2005-06-01) is that 

 * there are unfortunate occasions in which the porcelain is not
   flushing, and 

 * the knowledge of what the plumbing does is a good thing to have
   for such occasions.  It will help you figure out what needs to be
   done.

The rewritten text means a very different thing, at least to me.

 * there are things plumbing does for you.

 * the knowledge of what they are helps when the porcelain isn't
   flushing.

Just dropping "for" instead of adding "you" may make it easier to
read, grammatically more correct and retain the original intent
better, I suspect.