From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>,
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:47:08 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611161041040.3746@virtualbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611151753300.3746@virtualbox>
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Dscho's mention of 'still times out' may be an indiciation that
> > something unspecified on 'pu' is not ready to be merged to 'next',
> > but blocking all of 'pu' with a blanket statement is not useful,
> > and that was where my response comes from.
>
> Until the time when the test suite takes less than the insane three hours
> to run, I am afraid that a blanket statement on `pu` is the best I can do.
Well, I should add that the test suite does not take 3 hours to run for
`pu` these days.
It used to time out after four hours until two days ago (I think; I was a
bit too busy with other CI work to pay close attention to the constantly
failing `pu` job, with quite a few failing `next`s and even a couple of
failing `master`s thrown in).
As of two days ago, the test suite takes no time at all. The build already
fails (which makes me wonder why a couple of patch series I contributed
had such a hard time getting into `pu` when they compiled and tested
just fine, whereas some obviously non-building stuff gets into `pu`
already, makes no sense to me).
This is the offending part from last night's build:
-- snipsnap --
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z copy.c: In function 'copy_dir_1':
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z copy.c:369:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'lchown' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z if (lchown(dest, source_stat.st_uid, source_stat.st_gid) < 0)
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z ^~~~~~
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z copy.c:391:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'mknod' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z if (mknod(dest, source_stat.st_mode, source_stat.st_rdev) < 0)
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z ^~~~~
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z copy.c:405:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'utimes' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z if (utimes(dest, times) < 0)
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z ^~~~~~
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z copy.c:407:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'chown' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z if (chown(dest, source_stat.st_uid, source_stat.st_gid) < 0) {
2016-11-16T00:31:57.5321220Z ^~~~~
2016-11-16T00:31:57.7982432Z CC ctype.o
2016-11-16T00:31:58.1418929Z cc1.exe: all warnings being treated as errors
2016-11-16T00:31:58.6368128Z make: *** [Makefile:1988: copy.o] Error 1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-11 16:29 [PATCH] mingw: hot-fix t5615 Johannes Schindelin
2016-11-11 17:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-11-11 17:11 ` Johannes Sixt
2016-11-11 17:31 ` [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables Johannes Sixt
2016-11-11 18:16 ` Jeff King
2016-11-11 18:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-11-12 11:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-11-13 1:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-11-14 9:11 ` Lars Schneider
2016-11-14 16:35 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-11-14 17:01 ` Jeff King
2016-11-14 19:45 ` Ramsay Jones
2016-11-14 17:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-11-15 16:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-11-16 9:47 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2016-11-16 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-11-11 18:12 ` [PATCH] mingw: hot-fix t5615 Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1611161041040.3746@virtualbox \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).