Re: [PATCH] remote: drop free_refspecs() function

[Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>]

Jeff King wrote:

> Subject: [PATCH] remote: drop free_refspecs() function
>
> We already have free_refspec(), a public function which does
> the same thing as the static free_refspecs(). Let's just
> keep one.  There are two minor differences between the
> functions:
>
>   1. free_refspecs() is a noop when the refspec argument is
>      NULL. This probably doesn't matter in practice.  The
>      nr_refspec parameter would presumably be 0 in that
>      case, skipping the loop. And free(NULL) is explicitly
>      OK. But it doesn't hurt for us to port this extra
>      safety to free_refspec(), as one of the callers passes
>      a funny "i+1" count.
>
>   2. The order of arguments is reversed between the two
>      functions. This patch uses the already-public order of
>      free_refspec(), as it matches the argument order on the
>      parsing side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> ---
>  remote.c | 28 ++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

Thanks.