From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD5A71F66E for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5WS7-0001ZY-4R; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:44:39 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5WS5-0001ZG-8k for sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:44:37 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version :Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ovYSoISkfpTIM2JhWJ84fBWXC6a9AOHLodlHnzop4o8=; b=ClsXJAYhX9hQGMiquZisyZKNCF tFpzAS3xXcgLz27TXfN00iCFvbVvAR51k9sVuMbBhEruXekWOfVS9GnF8Ksq5V7bu0migytjUedTw aI1CG+8AQtpZ8UGqSO7sM8EpCk63FGSCIlttrnVuSLRBuYv2sLAnfxIs70LOdF1QQPhk=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ovYSoISkfpTIM2JhWJ84fBWXC6a9AOHLodlHnzop4o8=; b=e4Cm0mWFcSj4I+XSJdtWkNpyo2 MuN7++zyjJyOndgHSUFGdtVsSvEJX52XJoquj1qmA8QVeb+Wed8F47jmlcD/RU0SrTbVJiCsH7xwk kuZ+RL3JUgvBAZa7kiXXythf6XiX6vIpd3e8THdSzEaP3DFHWQh80L3C39nrOArhlKNI=; Received: from [81.2.72.234] (helo=unicorn.mansr.com) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1k5WRz-006GEh-Jg for sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:44:37 +0000 Received: from raven.mansr.com (raven.mansr.com [IPv6:2001:8b0:ca0d:8d8e::3]) by unicorn.mansr.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B6015360; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:44:15 +0100 (BST) Received: by raven.mansr.com (Postfix, from userid 51770) id 318D621A6F2; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:44:15 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= To: Jan Stary References: <20200811141209.GA9040@www.stare.cz> <20200811153001.GB87966@www.stare.cz> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:44:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200811153001.GB87966@www.stare.cz> (Jan Stary's message of "Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:30:01 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Headers-End: 1k5WRz-006GEh-Jg Subject: Re: symlinks X-BeenThere: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: sox-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Jan Stary writes: > On Aug 11 15:25:36, mans@mansr.com wrote: >> Jan Stary writes: >> = >> > I am confused by the following commit: >> > >> > commit fc20c26b2500acb6690f03d610d406bffb8944a9 >> > Author: Mans Rullgard >> > Date: Mon Aug 10 21:38:11 2020 +0100 >> > >> > build: fix symlink selection >> > >> > The configure test whether to enable the play/rec links is broken, >> > and the makefile uses the same condition for both play/rec and sox= i. >> > Fix both problems. >> > >> > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >> > index 9f55b5f8..12af65b0 100644 >> > --- a/configure.ac >> > +++ b/configure.ac >> > @@ -647,13 +647,13 @@ AC_MSG_RESULT($enable_symlinks) >> > enable_playrec_symlinks=3Dno >> > if test "$enable_symlinks" =3D "yes"; then >> > SYMLINKS=3Dyes >> > - if test false \ >> > - -o "$enable_alsa" =3D yes \ >> > - -o "$enable_ao" =3D yes \ >> > - -o "$enable_coreaudio" =3D yes \ >> > - -o "$enable_oss" =3D yes \ >> > - -o "$enable_pulseaudio" =3D yes \ >> > - -o "$enable_sndio" =3D yes \ >> > + if test "" \ >> > + -o "$using_alsa" =3D yes \ >> > + -o "$using_ao" =3D yes \ >> > + -o "$using_coreaudio" =3D yes \ >> > + -o "$using_oss" =3D yes \ >> > + -o "$using_pulseaudio" =3D yes \ >> > + -o "$using_sndio" =3D yes \ >> > ; then >> > PLAYRECLINKS=3Dyes >> > enable_playrec_symlinks=3Dyes >> > >> > How is using alsa/oss/sndio/whatever >> > related to creating symlinks (or not)? >> > >> > Why do we have both SYMLINKS and PLAYRECLINKS? >> > Why is this different for play/rec vs soxi (also below)? >> > >> > Naively, I would assume we want to create symlinks >> > for each of play, rec, soxi, or none of them. >> = >> There is no point in creating play/rec symlinks >> when no audio devices are supported since they can't work then. > > The current build system seems to omit sunaudio and waveaudio > from the list above, but with the rationale you describe, > they should be there too, right? Or is this intended? Sorry, I missed that. > Anyway, the manpages still get symlinked even if play/rec don't, > e.g. when all the drivers ar explicitly disabled. Is that intended? I missed that too. The whole thing is a mess. -- = M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd _______________________________________________ Sox-users mailing list Sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users