From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 913DC1F66E for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5wGM-0006j4-6O; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:18:14 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5wGL-0006it-9i for sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:18:13 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version :Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xkSzsVC8fHTXBaotMlRRriQHhagQK8mj2VMkUGHTrZQ=; b=E7g6K5U/Ey53FwIPrXIM07KfP/ WUqCKvns9sQdrbNpA147v/+WKlmIR4ebxJXHcMiUulcvh4Lmr2TpsuF0FdmQ/VbWp7KSe6FnlHo4x iA2AbWSE0ofX7zF+wzt5DMc7eXDFJAGWFsunAI4E08xDtZBcPVYT4e29NtvwBUMj0kuI=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xkSzsVC8fHTXBaotMlRRriQHhagQK8mj2VMkUGHTrZQ=; b=EPOpqZ27rHf4tSNnC+xgkebAIv MtM0NX4ZmPJh80WgPzkRYoBoFcTkKTE5Q/FSm0lkvZe5OhEJH8XqYP4VLzh4zGa7KYw231q/toH5j nUf2zQME5dTDPwfF3vTxg33+5pZg99aJiIQVUP9qh9QQJPP05USjCXVqHxWXZHOKjhE4=; Received: from unicorn.mansr.com ([81.2.72.234]) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1k5wGJ-00B2TI-S1 for sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:18:13 +0000 Received: from raven.mansr.com (raven.mansr.com [81.2.72.235]) by unicorn.mansr.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 739C415360; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 20:18:05 +0100 (BST) Received: by raven.mansr.com (Postfix, from userid 51770) id 6764821A6F2; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 20:18:05 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= To: Jan Stary References: <20200812164112.GA44586@www.stare.cz> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 20:18:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200812164112.GA44586@www.stare.cz> (Jan Stary's message of "Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:41:12 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Headers-End: 1k5wGJ-00B2TI-S1 Subject: Re: gsm X-BeenThere: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: sox-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Jan Stary writes: > Here is a branch that drops the internal gsm > and only supports gsm as an external format. > https://sourceforge.net/u/janstary/sox/ci/gsm/tree/ > > I also propose to drop the support for an external gsm altogether. > The format is supported by libsndfile, which is actively maintained, > as opposed to gsm implementations out there. Libsndfile has its own copy of the same gsm library. I don't think an extra level of indirection will fix any bugs there, regardless of what David Wheeler said. > And I also propose to drop the internal lpc in the same way; > in fact, to drop LPC support altogether. Is anyone using it? Well, someone saw fit to add it. That particular library seems to be dead, and distro packages don't exist. The decision isn't as simple as for gsm. Then again, the absence of packages suggest that nobody cares about the format. The Asterisk phone package includes a copy of the same library, but that's all I can find. Nonetheless, I don't want to rush ahead and remove features without due warning. It's not causing me any trouble, so I'm going to leave it for now. What I might do is disable some of the more obscure formats by default. That way, any bugs in that code will only affect users who have actively enabled them. -- = M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd _______________________________________________ Sox-users mailing list Sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users